Bill Marquette wrote:
Someone hasn't done their research. This has been answered in the ML,
the forum, the FAQ, AND the blog.
*AND* today on the m0n0wall list, where he originally sent this message,
and got my answer 8 minutes before sending the message again to this list.
Someone hasn't done their research. This has been answered in the ML,
the forum, the FAQ, AND the blog.
--Bill
On 1/6/06, Claudio Castro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Scott Ullrich escribió:
> > Do you have a question?
> >
>
> Of course, cant you read?
>
> So, that means that if I have my NATed s
On 1/6/06, Claudio Castro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Scott Ullrich escribió:
> > Do you have a question?
> >
>
> Of course, cant you read?
When someone blasts a message with > in front of them it looks like a
reply. Since you're so nice I'll let you figure the rest out.
> So, that means that
Scott Ullrich escribió:
Do you have a question?
Of course, cant you read?
So, that means that if I have my NATed services in a different
interface (other than the LAN) e.g. a DMZ, is it possible to access
this NATed services from the LAN Subnet??
and is that is correct, HOW do I redirect co
Do you have a question?
On 1/6/06, Claudio Castro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Guys..listen to this:
> >
> > *Problem. *It is not possible to access NATed services using the
> > public (WAN) IP address from within LAN (or an optional network).
> > Example: you've got a server in your LAN behind
Guys..listen to this:
*Problem. *It is not possible to access NATed services using the
public (WAN) IP address from within LAN (or an optional network).
Example: you've got a server in your LAN behind pfSense and added a
NAT/filter rule to allow external access to its HTTP port. While you
can
