Re: [pfSense-discussion] atmel avr port of pfsense?
I may take a look into this I haven't touched net in a while and could use this as a good excuse to On 7/31/07, Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 7/31/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Most of the steps should be the same for NetBSD as they are for FreeBSD > since they share a lot of commonalities. > > Not quite. You will find a lot of items that rely on netgraph such as > PPTP, PPPoE, etc. > > Scott >
Re: [pfSense-discussion] atmel avr port of pfsense?
On 7/31/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Most of the steps should be the same for NetBSD as they are for FreeBSD since > they share a lot of commonalities. Not quite. You will find a lot of items that rely on netgraph such as PPTP, PPPoE, etc. Scott
Re: [pfSense-discussion] atmel avr port of pfsense?
On Tue, 31 Jul 2007, jason whitt wrote: I'd be intrested in seeing a net port let me know if any help is needed On 7/31/07, Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 7/31/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [snip] This looks like a job for NetBSD! Good luck porting pfSense to Net! :) Scott Most of the steps should be the same for NetBSD as they are for FreeBSD since they share a lot of commonalities. I don't really have a lot of time to put into this because I'm busy with my FreeBSD pkg_install SoC project and work, but I'll add this to my wish list later on down the line.. -Garrett
Re: [pfSense-discussion] atmel avr port of pfsense?
I'd be intrested in seeing a net port let me know if any help is needed On 7/31/07, Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 7/31/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [snip] > > This looks like a job for NetBSD! > > Good luck porting pfSense to Net! :) > > Scott >
Re: [pfSense-discussion] atmel avr port of pfsense?
On 7/31/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [snip] > This looks like a job for NetBSD! Good luck porting pfSense to Net! :) Scott
Re: [pfSense-discussion] atmel avr port of pfsense?
On Tue, 31 Jul 2007, Chris Buechler wrote: Paul M wrote: http://www.linuxdevices.com/news/NS2837651365.html "32MB of SDRAM and 16MB of flash, expandable via an SD-card slot." aside from the fact that those two numbers alone mean it's far from compatible, it's not an x86 system, it's RISC. It won't run m0n0wall either. It may run FreeBSD though if it's MIPs compatible, but I haven't checked out the FreeBSD MIPS port yet.. This looks like a job for NetBSD! -Garrett
Re: [pfSense-discussion] atmel avr port of pfsense?
Paul M wrote: http://www.linuxdevices.com/news/NS2837651365.html "32MB of SDRAM and 16MB of flash, expandable via an SD-card slot." aside from the fact that those two numbers alone mean it's far from compatible, it's not an x86 system, it's RISC. It won't run m0n0wall either.
Re: [pfSense-discussion] atmel avr port of pfsense?
Hi, take a look at http://www.pfsense.com/index.php?id=43 You'll see that you need a minimam of 128mb ram, and even 128mb of storage on Flash or whatever. Good luck. Roeland 2007/7/31, Paul M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > http://www.linuxdevices.com/news/NS2837651365.html > "32MB of SDRAM and 16MB of flash, expandable via an SD-card slot." > > is this a powerful enough board to run a minimal pfsense system? > > >
Re: [pfSense-discussion] atmel avr port of pfsense?
On 7/31/07, Paul M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "32MB of SDRAM and 16MB of flash, expandable via an SD-card slot." Likely not. This is specced about the same as the Soekris 4501-30, which used to be enough but not any more. I think m0n0 would do okay, though. That, or another minimalist distro, but m0n0 by far has the nicest feature-set of any small system I've seen. RB
[pfSense-discussion] atmel avr port of pfsense?
http://www.linuxdevices.com/news/NS2837651365.html "32MB of SDRAM and 16MB of flash, expandable via an SD-card slot." is this a powerful enough board to run a minimal pfsense system?
