Re: [pfSense-discussion] clog size

2008-04-14 Thread Scott Ullrich
On 4/14/08, Paul M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > if clog is turned off, does it then use "tail -N" and look at a normal > log file instead of using clog to view? Yes, it omits the clog binary completely. Scott

Re: [pfSense-discussion] clog size

2008-04-14 Thread Paul M
Scott Ullrich wrote: > On 4/14/08, Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I have commited some code to help with this: >> >> http://cvs.pfsense.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/pfSense/usr/local/www/guiconfig.inc?rev=1.90.2.50;content-type=text%2Fx-cvsweb-markup > > Woops, wrong URL: > http://cvs.pfs

Re: [pfSense-discussion] clog size

2008-04-14 Thread Scott Ullrich
On 4/14/08, Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have commited some code to help with this: > > http://cvs.pfsense.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/pfSense/usr/local/www/guiconfig.inc?rev=1.90.2.50;content-type=text%2Fx-cvsweb-markup Woops, wrong URL: http://cvs.pfsense.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/pfSe

Re: [pfSense-discussion] clog size

2008-04-14 Thread Scott Ullrich
On 4/14/08, Paul M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > RB wrote: > > I've had a request to increase logging duration on systems that have > > no access to an external syslog server, so am making the necessary > > changes to maintain much larger ring-log files. Incredibly larger - > > > what we've done

Re: [pfSense-discussion] clog size

2008-04-14 Thread RB
> what we've done is to make a few tweaks and install syslog-ng I seriously considered that, but for the added 'complexity' and not everyone on the team being on the same page, the most supportable approach is simply increasing the sizes clog initializes its files to. Some experimentation ind

Re: [pfSense-discussion] clog size

2008-04-14 Thread Paul M
RB wrote: > I've had a request to increase logging duration on systems that have > no access to an external syslog server, so am making the necessary > changes to maintain much larger ring-log files. Incredibly larger - what we've done is to make a few tweaks and install syslog-ng 1/ change

Re: [pfSense-discussion] clog size

2008-04-11 Thread RB
> a few other things we'd like to see as well, if you would be willing to > rewrite the logging system we can discuss further. Any progress on an Hg feed or at least anonymous CVS (cvsup hasn't built on Linux for quite some time)? I'd be a lot more gung-ho about development and submitting patches

Re: [pfSense-discussion] clog size

2008-04-11 Thread Chris Buechler
RB wrote: I've had a request to increase logging duration on systems that have no access to an external syslog server, so am making the necessary changes to maintain much larger ring-log files. Incredibly larger - averaging 1000-1500B/s to certain logs, and we're looking at 20-30 days' worth. S

[pfSense-discussion] clog size

2008-04-11 Thread RB
I've had a request to increase logging duration on systems that have no access to an external syslog server, so am making the necessary changes to maintain much larger ring-log files. Incredibly larger - averaging 1000-1500B/s to certain logs, and we're looking at 20-30 days' worth. Storage isn't