Yes, altough you could move to 192.168.0.0/23 first, already doubling the
number of usable addresses...
-Aarno
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 13:25, Eugen Leitl eu...@leitl.org wrote:
It seems I'll be running out of LAN addresses on the local 192.168.0.0/24soon.
Is boosting it as easy as moving to
; eu...@leitl.org
Subject: Re: [pfSense-discussion] extending LAN private network
Yes, altough you could move to 192.168.0.0/23http://192.168.0.0/23 first,
already doubling the number of usable addresses...
-Aarno
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 13:25, Eugen Leitl
eu...@leitl.orgmailto:eu...@leitl.org
On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 01:52:46PM +0100, Greg Hennessy wrote:
What he said :-).
Using a /16 is guaranteed to come back and bite you in the posterior
I can use 192.168.x.0 with x coding for specific things, like
storeys, or admin addresses.
at some later stage. Go to a /22
On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 03:48:33PM +0100, Paul Mansfield wrote:
use vlans, a managed switch, and use 192.168.x.0/24 for each vlan. for
bonus points, use NAC and dynamic vlans to allow only approved devices
and put them on the right network.
I like this suggestion. Looks like the way to go.
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 3:34 PM, David Rees dree...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 7:48 AM, Paul Mansfield
it-admin-pfse...@taptu.com wrote:
use vlans, a managed switch, and use 192.168.x.0/24 for each vlan. for
bonus points, use NAC and dynamic vlans to allow only approved devices
On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 12:34:26PM -0700, David Rees wrote:
(we do something similar, vlan N is 192.168.N/24. it's bad practise to
use vlan1 so we start at 2)
I'm fairly new to VLANs - why is it bad practice to use vlan1?
Because VLAN ID 1 is the default VLAN?
--
Eugen* Leitl a
To: discussion@pfsense.com
Cc: eu...@leitl.org
Subject: Re: [pfSense-discussion] extending LAN private network
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 7:48 AM, Paul Mansfield
it-admin-pfse...@taptu.com wrote:
use vlans, a managed switch, and use 192.168.x.0/24 for each vlan. for
bonus points, use NAC and dynamic vlans
On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 12:34 -0700, David Rees wrote:
I'm fairly new to VLANs - why is it bad practice to use vlan1?
-Dave
Especially in a Cisco environment VLAN-1 is, beside being the default
VLAN, also used by several management protocols like CDP, VTP, VQP, ...
Some of them carries network
