I think that more generally, this distinction makes no sense in the first
place. Why is support from some organization better than support from a
company?
On Wed, Dec 13, 2017, 11:22 Carsten Agger wrote:
> One thing that might help ever so little ...
>
>
> Several of my
r, this is understandably a problem. We will probably run
Discourse out of a container shipped by the project, not a package, so does
that still apply to us?
Cheers,
Mirko.
--
Mirko Boehm | mi...@kde.org | KDE e.V.
FSFE Fellowship Representative, FSFE Team Germany
Qt Certified Specialist and
already. If you cut that step out
> then how long is it before non-free stuff creeps in?
These are real questions. I don’t have any answers for them. To me the issue of
JS in web services is separate from them, though.
Best,
Mirko.
--
Mirko Boehm | mi...@kde.org | KDE e.V.
FSFE Fellowshi
Javascript to me is not a relevant issue anymore since JS is an open standard
and browsers are sandboxed these days.
Best,
Mirko.
--
Mirko Boehm | mi...@kde.org | KDE e.V.
FSFE Fellowship Representative, FSFE Team Germany
Qt Certified Specialist and Trainer
Request a meeting: https://doodle.com/
nt, autocratic model that is tailored to protecting the
position of the figure heads. It is also apparent that all these organisation
struggle with renewal and maintaining relevance and a contributor base. This is
a fate I we should avoid for FSFE. I don’t think inaction is a good approach.
Cheers,
Mirko.
ould be wonderful. Maybe try to focus on issues where we can work
together, and move things forward towards tangible results.
Best,
Mirko.
--
Mirko Boehm | mi...@kde.org | KDE e.V.
FSFE Team Germany
Qt Certified Specialist and Trainer
Request a meeting: https://doodle.com/mirkoboehm
signature.
ake it fit for the future.
I wish you all the best for the next big thing, whatever that is for you.
Thanks for all your work!
Mirko.
--
Mirko Boehm | mi...@kde.org | KDE e.V.
FSFE Team Germany
Qt Certified Specialist and Trainer
Request a meeting: https://doodle.com/mirkoboehm
Hello,
> On 9. May 2019, at 12:40, Reinhard Müller wrote:
>
> Am 09.05.19 um 11:54 schrieb Mirko Boehm:
>> OFE is a great ally to FSFE, and has a mission that is strongly related
>> to ours. It is however not a software freedom focused organisation. It
>&g
Hi,
> On 6. May 2019, at 04:36, Florian Snow wrote:
>
> Calling Daniel's behavior a symptom is a gross understatement.
The symptoms of some ailments can be quite unpleasant, even icky. But I see
your point. Now for some root cause analysis, please.
Cheers,
Mirko.
--
Mirko B
s commonly assumed here. This also explains
the dopey wording on the Twitter message that exploded.
Best,
Mirko.
--
Mirko Boehm | mi...@kde.org | KDE e.V.
FSFE Team Germany
Qt Certified Specialist and Trainer
Request a meeting: https://doodle.com/mirkoboehm
__
dent accountable, was
also removed.
I urge everybody to make up their own opinion. I do not condone Daniel’s
activities. However to act as if Daniel is the problem, instead of a symptom of
the underlying problem, may not be good enough.
Best,
Mirko.
--
Mir
facing it.
>
> Regards,
> Bernhard
>
> --
> FSFE -- Founding Member Support our work for Free Software:
> blogs.fsfe.org/bernhard https://fsfe.org/donate | contribute
> ___
> Discussion mailing list
> Discussion@lists.
hat would inevitably follow from any sort of
modernisation of FSFE.
Best,
Mirko.
--
Mirko Boehm | mi...@kde.org | KDE e.V.
Qt Certified Specialist and Trainer
Request a meeting: https://doodle.com/mirkoboehm
___
Discussion mailing list
Discussio
Hi!
> On 28 Feb 2017, at 10:11, Agner Fog <ag...@agner.org> wrote:
>
> Mirko Boehm wrote:
>> I cannot speak for FSFE, but I think the setup can be made simpler: Anybody
>> can donate to FSFE. Just ask them to provide proof of the donation, and then
>> you
Hi!
> On 27 Feb 2017, at 14:40, Agner Fog <ag...@agner.org> wrote:
>
> On 27-02-2017 11:06, Mirko Boehm (FSFE) wrote:
>> You will need permission/license from the other contributors to sell
>> proprietary licenses.
>> You need a scheme that fairly dis
LAs that enable proprietary licensing.
However in your situation this is already the case, so in my understanding it
would make your software more free (because others can contribute to it).
Please be aware that this is not an official FSFE position.
Hope this helps,
Mirko.
--
Mirko Boehm | mi...
c for the newsletter. We need to keep it in mind as
“lessons learned” for future summits. Do we already have a process for that?
Best,
Mirko.
--
Mirko Boehm | mi...@kde.org | KDE e.V.
FSFE Fellow, FSFE Team Germany
Qt Certified Specialist
Request a meeting: https://doodle.com/mirkoboehm
__
o support FSFE, but for their own reasons use Gmail.
Best,
Mirko.
--
Mirko Boehm | mi...@kde.org | KDE e.V.
FSFE Fellowship Representative, FSFE Team Germany
Qt Certified Specialist and Trainer
Request a meeting: https://doodle.com/mirkoboehm
___
Discus
than this. Especially because we have a clear, freedom focused
message that explains itself pretty well.
Best,
Mirko.
--
Mirko Boehm | mi...@kde.org | KDE e.V.
FSFE Fellowship Representative, FSFE Team Germany
Qt Certified Specialist and Trainer
Request a meeting: https://doodle.com/mirkoboehm
e a
new video service. But how do we get those who are not in our network to know
about it?
I am all for the idea. But it is important to keep in mind that FSFE is
foremost not an organisation that facilitates free software development. Not
that we could not, but it is not our mission.
Best
s
directly related to matters of software freedom, and grounded on verifiable
facts.
Thanks,
Mirko.
--
Mirko Boehm | mi...@kde.org | KDE e.V.
FSFE Fellowship Representative, FSFE Team Germany
Qt Certified Specialist and Trainer
Request a meeting: https://doodle.com/mirkoboehm
ndering if anyone from the FSFE is planning to attend
> the event and represent FSFE?
>
> The agenda looks surprisingly interesting, I must say
--
Mirko Boehm | mi...@kde.org | KDE e.V.
Qt Certified Specialist and Trainer
Request a meeting
22 matches
Mail list logo