Oct 19, 2019, 01:04 by aristo...@tutanota.com:
Oct 18, 2019, 09:53 by ahil...@keemail.me:
Daniel. He brought us the minutes of FSFE
Did he?
He needed the distance for security reasons, but I don't think we have any
enemies among us anymore and we can admit it. I also got a copy of the minutes
On 19/10/2019 02:04, aristo...@tutanota.com wrote:
>
> Oct 18, 2019, 09:53 by ahil...@keemail.me:
>
> Daniel. He brought us the minutes of FSFE
>
>
> Did he?
>
I wasn't there
Pleas remember we don't even know if these minutes that keep appearing
(we've seen 3 permutations so far) are
Oct 18, 2019, 12:45 by ignuc...@tutanota.com:
> There are almost no British left in Canada.
>
That is good for Canada. That makes it the better America.
___
Discussion mailing list
Discussion@lists.fsfellowship.eu
Oct 18, 2019, 09:53 by ahil...@keemail.me:
> Daniel. He brought us the minutes of FSFE
>
Did he?
___
Discussion mailing list
Discussion@lists.fsfellowship.eu
https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
18 Oct 2019, 12:54 by anw...@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de:
> You forgot Canada. The British are still in North America. The rebels were
> able to beat Spain or the Mexicans, but not the British in Canada.
Canada is a interesting topic. There are almost no British left in Canada.
Extreme left-wing
Oct 18, 2019, 10:54 by anw...@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de:
Please start immediately ! ASAP!
Can you finally tell us how the FSFE helped you increase the number of free
software organizations?
___
Discussion mailing list
Discussion@lists.fsfellowship.eu
Oct 17, 2019, 20:55 by ignuc...@tutanota.com:
I received word lately at a conference in Belgium: also "April" in
France is a malicious actor who has to be observed. It seems
they work together with monopolist companies to fund their mission
to become a huge European organisation. Does anybody
Am 18.10.19 um 12:39 schrieb ahil...@keemail.me:
> We can finally plan our glorious future
Please start immediately ! ASAP!
It is no coincidence that 238 years ago today the Americans finally
beat the British and drove them out of their country. Just as the
Americans got rid of the dirty
Oct 17, 2019, 20:26 by bugs@gnu.support:
That knife is there, says that document was tampered by
somebody. Fine. But overall it looks genuine.
I think Chris Lamb was at FSFE this year. He then published it all. I know that
because Chris Lamb already sent Daniel an email that only had knives
Oct 17, 2019, 20:04 by rol...@mxchange.org:
Is there a way where I can setup a personal (non-global) block against a
specific sender? Starting to become anoying what this one (you know who)
writes. To much BS for me.
You shouldn't block Daniel. He is sometimes impulsive, but he is a good guy. I
Oct 17, 2019, 19:57 by dan...@pocock.pro:
Two different documents appeared today claiming to be minutes of the
FSFE e.V. annual meeting
Thank you for making it appear! The prophet says let there be light and let
there be light. It is very good that you keep a certain distance, but I am
happy
Am 17.10.19 um 22:23 schrieb RMS Support:
that there are dangerous people like Stehman
> exist
If you discover me "dangerous", then I obviously use my only weapon
well: free speech.
Thank you very much for that nice compliment.
If you want to disarm me, you have to install censorship. Very
* Roland Häder [2019-10-18 02:21]:
> I like your statements a lot as I tend to speak the truth over lies out
> and I may include horse and rider, means responsible persons in it.
> But one thing starts anoying here and that is this constant attacks on
> FSF/E/A (and maybe not limited to them).
>>Can you ask them? I am asking them.
>
> Yes, put m...@fsfe.org on CC. He is the FSFE president.
I say, let us not ask any more but just say the truth. Indeed this
is far beyond FSFE.
We have to question everything. Your revelations made clear that
Debian is a assassination community lead by
On 10/17/2019 10:15 PM, Henning Thielemann wrote:
>
> On Thu, 17 Oct 2019, Roland Häder wrote:
>
>> Is there a way where I can setup a personal (non-global) block against a
>> specific sender? Starting to become anoying what this one (you know who)
>> writes. To much BS for me.
>
> I guess the
On 10/17/2019 10:23 PM, RMS Support wrote:
> Oct 17, 2019, 20:04 by rol...@mxchange.org:
>> Is there a way where I can setup a personal (non-global) block against a
>> specific sender? Starting to become annoying what this one (you know who)
>> writes. To much BS for me.
> I cannot understand why
On 17/10/2019 21:26, Jean Louis wrote:
> * Daniel Pocock [2019-10-18 01:28]:
>> The second document also appears to contain two resignation emails.
>> I've heard that there have actually been more resignations than
>> that.
>
> So you also say that those could be real.
>
> I have published
17. Okt. 2019, 22:21 von dan...@pocock.pro:
anonymous identities on this email list. We can all thank Cryptie for
her leadership in the use of anonymity, she was first and I won't be the
one to compromise her real name.
He he, that is ironic as you told us the truth about her name already.
I
* Daniel Pocock [2019-10-18 01:28]:
> The second document also appears to contain two resignation emails.
> I've heard that there have actually been more resignations than
> that.
So you also say that those could be real.
I have published few pages:
Oct 17, 2019, 20:04 by rol...@mxchange.org:
> Is there a way where I can setup a personal (non-global) block against a
> specific sender? Starting to become annoying what this one (you know who)
> writes. To much BS for me.
I cannot understand why people like you want to block valid opinions.
I
On 17/10/2019 21:04, Roland Häder wrote:
> Is there a way where I can setup a personal (non-global) block against a
> specific sender? Starting to become anoying what this one (you know who)
> writes. To much BS for me.
>
Great question
"you know who" is somewhat ambiguous, everybody has a
On Thu, 17 Oct 2019, Roland Häder wrote:
Is there a way where I can setup a personal (non-global) block against a
specific sender? Starting to become anoying what this one (you know who)
writes. To much BS for me.
I guess the most simple way is to configure a filter rule in your e-mail
Oct 17, 2019, 19:57 by dan...@pocock.pro:
The second document also appears to contain two resignation emails.
I've heard that there have actually been more resignations than that.
That is a interesting thought and I think there will be minimum 10 more who
will resign within the next weeks. I
23 matches
Mail list logo
