Re: Can I block this sender? Was: Re: FSFE minutes, or a vendetta?
Oct 19, 2019, 01:04 by aristo...@tutanota.com: Oct 18, 2019, 09:53 by ahil...@keemail.me: Daniel. He brought us the minutes of FSFE Did he? He needed the distance for security reasons, but I don't think we have any enemies among us anymore and we can admit it. I also got a copy of the minutes and forwarded it to Daniel. But of course he doesn't know me and doesn't trust me. I also didn't want him to say that he got it from me. Actually, it doesn't matter if enemies know that I sent him the minutes. I just must not say who I have it from. But Daniel is our hero and I can hardly wait for him to release his audio recordings. Then we'll really show it to FSFE! ___ Discussion mailing list Discussion@lists.fsfellowship.eu https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Re: Can I block this sender? Was: Re: FSFE minutes, or a vendetta?
On 19/10/2019 02:04, aristo...@tutanota.com wrote: > > Oct 18, 2019, 09:53 by ahil...@keemail.me: > > Daniel. He brought us the minutes of FSFE > > > Did he? > I wasn't there Pleas remember we don't even know if these minutes that keep appearing (we've seen 3 permutations so far) are even real or a hoax ___ Discussion mailing list Discussion@lists.fsfellowship.eu https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Re: FSFE minutes, or a vendetta?
Oct 18, 2019, 12:45 by ignuc...@tutanota.com: > There are almost no British left in Canada. > That is good for Canada. That makes it the better America. ___ Discussion mailing list Discussion@lists.fsfellowship.eu https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Re: Can I block this sender? Was: Re: FSFE minutes, or a vendetta?
Oct 18, 2019, 09:53 by ahil...@keemail.me: > Daniel. He brought us the minutes of FSFE > Did he? ___ Discussion mailing list Discussion@lists.fsfellowship.eu https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Re: FSFE minutes, or a vendetta?
18 Oct 2019, 12:54 by anw...@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de: > You forgot Canada. The British are still in North America. The rebels were > able to beat Spain or the Mexicans, but not the British in Canada. Canada is a interesting topic. There are almost no British left in Canada. Extreme left-wing Trudeau [ever noticed his name is French? Coincidence?] and his puppets work on smuggling a huge number of non-British in the country with the goal to irritate locals and distract them from making big leaps forward in their societal progression. But people start to see the pattern. In fact, it's the same pattern backstabbers like Bradley, Brock and bald-headed feminists apply. And again, people start to rise up and spread the truth: --> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bjnRAlpmduk But let us not be distracted from listening to these liars. We have to act, not react! -- https://backtotheaugust.org/ ___ Discussion mailing list Discussion@lists.fsfellowship.eu https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Re: FSFE minutes, or a vendetta?
Oct 18, 2019, 10:54 by anw...@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de: Please start immediately ! ASAP! Can you finally tell us how the FSFE helped you increase the number of free software organizations? ___ Discussion mailing list Discussion@lists.fsfellowship.eu https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Re: FSFE minutes, or a vendetta?
Oct 17, 2019, 20:55 by ignuc...@tutanota.com: I received word lately at a conference in Belgium: also "April" in France is a malicious actor who has to be observed. It seems they work together with monopolist companies to fund their mission to become a huge European organisation. Does anybody know where we could find the skeletons in their closet? That doesn't surprise me. I haven't heard that April is working with Daniel. That means they are also part of the conspiracy that Maffias Kirchner and Florian Sow initiated. They kick poor volunteers like Daniel, who are already on the ground and for months have only been writing friendly blog posts in the hope that there will be an improvement. RMS also recently had a link on his site about similar cyberbullying: https://ogn.theonion.com/cyberbullying-alert-gamers-are-ganging-up-to-harass-th-1839102386 ___ Discussion mailing list Discussion@lists.fsfellowship.eu https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Re: FSFE minutes, or a vendetta?
Am 18.10.19 um 12:39 schrieb ahil...@keemail.me: > We can finally plan our glorious future Please start immediately ! ASAP! It is no coincidence that 238 years ago today the Americans finally beat the British and drove them out of their country. Just as the Americans got rid of the dirty British, You forgot Canada. The British are still in North America. The rebels were able to beat Spain or the Mexicans, but not the British in Canada. Kind regards Michael signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Discussion mailing list Discussion@lists.fsfellowship.eu https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Re: FSFE minutes, or a vendetta?
Oct 17, 2019, 20:26 by bugs@gnu.support: That knife is there, says that document was tampered by somebody. Fine. But overall it looks genuine. I think Chris Lamb was at FSFE this year. He then published it all. I know that because Chris Lamb already sent Daniel an email that only had knives like that in it. It's just like the FSFE minutes. Look: https://danielpocock.com/assets/2018-09-20-debian-revoke-smear.png This can't be a coincidence! Chris Lamb has installed a knife here again to harm RMS and Daniel. But our leader is protected by us! However, the writings and changes of Articles are carefully edited and they cannot be fake. I agree. It's just too good not to be true. FSFE should burn and will burn! Like Dusseldorf, like RMS, like all our enemies! ___ Discussion mailing list Discussion@lists.fsfellowship.eu https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Re: Can I block this sender? Was: Re: FSFE minutes, or a vendetta?
Oct 17, 2019, 20:04 by rol...@mxchange.org: Is there a way where I can setup a personal (non-global) block against a specific sender? Starting to become anoying what this one (you know who) writes. To much BS for me. You shouldn't block Daniel. He is sometimes impulsive, but he is a good guy. I haven't read a single word of BS from him yet. Well, the filtering maybe. But altogether 100% of what he says is true. He brought us the minutes of FSFE and showed us the true face of this organization. Stay with us and find the way to the truth! ___ Discussion mailing list Discussion@lists.fsfellowship.eu https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Re: FSFE minutes, or a vendetta?
Oct 17, 2019, 19:57 by dan...@pocock.pro:
Two different documents appeared today claiming to be minutes of the
FSFE e.V. annual meeting
Thank you for making it appear! The prophet says let there be light and let
there be light. It is very good that you keep a certain distance, but I am
happy about your contribution to this topic! Keep up the good fight for our
survival!
The way certain animals behaved after that brings the entire free
software concept into disrepute.
Are you talking about bears? They can actually be very aggressive, especially
Grizzly bears. But otherwise bears are great. But they only fuck once every few
years and that's not a good role model for us as you say. SJW also don't want
us to fuck much anymore because they're prude. They hide their beautiful juicy
boobies from us and threaten us if we even smile. So what are faggots supposed
to do with these rules? We have more men in our community and they are all
potential targets for mating. It can't go that way. Daniel ("and" Wikileaks)
has shown us that we must not listen to them. They gave us a collection of
great boobies and FSFE minutes. Real feminists fight by other means! The free
the nipple movement is a good example of good feminist work. They fight for
real equality without oppressing men and show us what we most like to see. So
we can all have a peaceful future and many descendants! We educate them in our
mindset, so that they all love free software. Then at some point w
e will only have people who love free software.
___
Discussion mailing list
Discussion@lists.fsfellowship.eu
https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Re: Can I block this sender? Was: Re: FSFE minutes, or a vendetta?
Am 17.10.19 um 22:23 schrieb RMS Support: that there are dangerous people like Stehman > exist If you discover me "dangerous", then I obviously use my only weapon well: free speech. Thank you very much for that nice compliment. If you want to disarm me, you have to install censorship. Very bad idea! Regards Michael Stehmann signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Discussion mailing list Discussion@lists.fsfellowship.eu https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Re: FSFE minutes, or a vendetta?
* Roland Häder [2019-10-18 02:21]: > I like your statements a lot as I tend to speak the truth over lies out > and I may include horse and rider, means responsible persons in it. > But one thing starts anoying here and that is this constant attacks on > FSF/E/A (and maybe not limited to them). I'm a recurring anually donor > and I keep it as long as I can effort, so I'm a FSFE member. But this > campaigning is in some way hilarious to me simply because what the > main goal of the FSF/E/A is, the spread use use free-libre open source > software (FLOSS). That is fine for you and your viewpoint. Issue with free speech: === The issue is defaming RMS over free speech. He did nothing illegal. He is founder of GNU project and the FSF, and FSFE would not exist without him. Joining in defamation of RMS is disgraceful. I am not member of the FSFE, but for as long as present President remains same, and same people, I would not donate anything to FSFE for that reason of denying free speech and taking rumor mongering biased side. If we are talking about freedom zero, that software shall be used by whomever for whatever reason, we are talking also about free speech in the first place. If we are talking about the free speech than there shall be no Thoughtpolice in free software movement. That is contradictory to each other. Can it be simpler? I expect from any free software organization to first respect free speech of everbody. And I expect that they fight for users' freedom in computing and software. The issue is: one cannot promote freedom zero by shutting the mouth of different-thinking people whoever they may be in the community. RMS is in fact quite a strong person to resist all the slander. But there are other people who would not even raise their voice and would simply disappear from community. If then fighting for freedom zero that EVERYBODY CAN USE SOFTWARE FOR WHATEVER REASON -- that is serious free speech issue, and only people who never thought about it, they will never understand it. We are fighting for good and bad people, irrelevant of their political views, to use software how they wish. In very bad extremist viewpoint, that would mean that free software could be used to damage humanity, even terrorists could use free software, thus also people with negative views, positive views, nazis, and anti-nazis, fashists, and anti-fashists, communists, and for Trump and Angela Merkel to use it how they wish, IRRELEVANT to opinions or political views of those people. Thus we are promoting freedom zero in the first place as free speech. Thus we cannot bash on the founder for his personal viewpoints which were anywhere never the point of GNU community. There is big difference if money is to be spent to organization that is truly transparent and truly pushes free software furtherance or if money will be spent to organization that pretends to be transparent, but is not. See how money is spent, here is example: On this page: https://fsfe.org/about/about.en.html There is statement: "To be an independent voice for Free Software, we depend on your donation. See how we use our funds and who donates to us." linking to: https://fsfe.org/about/funds/funds.en.html where I can see following: 2017542,772.73 447,394.08 linking to: Income and Expenses 2017 Income EUR Donations1 198,820.36 Supporter contributions and membership fees 208,581.31 Paid services 107,783.06 Merchandise 28,580.78 Interest and currency exchange gains7.22 Total income543,772.73 ExpensesEUR Basic infrastructure costs2 142,724.77 Public awareness3 116,770.30 Community support 1,641,50 Legal work 83,132.44 Policy work 76.760,25 FOSS4SMEs project 2.939,16 Merchandise 23,425,66 Total expenses 447,394.08 Surplus 96,378.65 I am sorry, but that is not telling me "how funds are used". That is maybe enough for children, not enough for me. What means "basic infrastructure costs"? If FSFE is truly transparent then why not publish the full balance sheet? What means "legal work"? Who exactly was paid among those attorneys? It is less transparent than any government that I know! "Open Source" issue: Other issues are staying truthful to original ideas of free software philosophy. Organization like FSF is not same as FSFE. FSF is not same as GNU. While it was same before, it is not same now. There are serious differences in promoting true free software philosophy or promoting "open source". There is difference between people promoting free software philosophy and people programming free software. Or people who are putting it all together in one box. It is not same, small details are making the difference. There are issues and there are differences, see: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.html Driving people to use non-free software: Every page of FSFE.org
Re: FSFE minutes, or a vendetta?
>>Can you ask them? I am asking them. > > Yes, put m...@fsfe.org on CC. He is the FSFE president. I say, let us not ask any more but just say the truth. Indeed this is far beyond FSFE. We have to question everything. Your revelations made clear that Debian is a assassination community lead by egoists. Your and others' revelations made clear that Software Freedom Conservancy is a group of backstabbers who would kill their own mother to spread their leftist propaganda. Together, we can proof that RMS is supposed to be assassinated by so-called justice warrior who want nothing more than a diverse community, containing scum that we cannot tolerate if we want to keep our society free. I received word lately at a conference in Belgium: also "April" in France is a malicious actor who has to be observed. It seems they work together with monopolist companies to fund their mission to become a huge European organisation. Does anybody know where we could find the skeletons in their closet? -- https://backtotheaugust.org ___ Discussion mailing list Discussion@lists.fsfellowship.eu https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Re: Can I block this sender? Was: Re: FSFE minutes, or a vendetta?
On 10/17/2019 10:15 PM, Henning Thielemann wrote: > > On Thu, 17 Oct 2019, Roland Häder wrote: > >> Is there a way where I can setup a personal (non-global) block against a >> specific sender? Starting to become anoying what this one (you know who) >> writes. To much BS for me. > > I guess the most simple way is to configure a filter rule in your > e-mail client program. Yes, I guess so. I thought of a server-side way in my personal account. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Discussion mailing list Discussion@lists.fsfellowship.eu https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Re: Can I block this sender? Was: Re: FSFE minutes, or a vendetta?
On 10/17/2019 10:23 PM, RMS Support wrote: > Oct 17, 2019, 20:04 by rol...@mxchange.org: >> Is there a way where I can setup a personal (non-global) block against a >> specific sender? Starting to become annoying what this one (you know who) >> writes. To much BS for me. > I cannot understand why people like you want to block valid opinions. > > I assume you mean A. Hilter. He says some strange things but he > rightfully pointed out that there are dangerous people like Stehman > exist who you usually don't know. You should not censor particular > people who say the truth, even if it may hurt. > > Sometimes pain is a good cleansing mechanism for body and brain. > You should try it. > > If you cannot hold the truth, you should leave this list. We don't need you > to get rid of the scum that eradicates our dear leaders. > > Here, I even help you: > https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/options/discussion > > -- > https://backtotheaugust.org/ > > > ___ > Discussion mailing list > Discussion@lists.fsfellowship.eu > https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/listinfo/discussion > I like your statements a lot as I tend to speak the truth over lies out and I may include "horse and rider", means responsible persons in it. But one thing starts anoying here and that is this constant attacks on FSF/E/A (and maybe not limited to them). I'm a recurring anually donor and I keep it as long as I can effort, so I'm a FSFE member. But this "campaigning" is in some way hilarious to me simply because what the main goal of the FSF/E/A is, the spread use use free-libre open source software (FLOSS). So these attacks are really not needed while we all should be thankful to RMS, Linus Torwalds, Alan Cox and all the other great and genius people. So thank you what you did to the world. Without you, this would be a much worse place. Maybe others come up with same idiologies but maybe they won't be organizes as the FSF/E/A and others are. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Discussion mailing list Discussion@lists.fsfellowship.eu https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Re: FSFE minutes, or a vendetta?
On 17/10/2019 21:26, Jean Louis wrote: > * Daniel Pocock [2019-10-18 01:28]: >> The second document also appears to contain two resignation emails. >> I've heard that there have actually been more resignations than >> that. > > So you also say that those could be real. > > I have published few pages: > https://pleroma.gnusocial.club/notice/9o1eDIfG9fZIxb2zLM on FSFE > social account, nobody yet answered anything. > > The stamp "CONFIDENTIAL" is not real, it is placed there > digitally. But could be anything. The stamp DRAFT looks more real. > > That knife is there, says that document was tampered by > somebody. Fine. But overall it looks genuine. > > However, the writings and changes of Articles are carefully edited and > they cannot be fake. > > The changes mentioned in overall document are consistent with each > other. > > That looks as real document to me. > I'm not sure that a German e.V. would have a "DRAFT" or "CONFIDENTIAL" stamp. The stamps would use the equivalent German words. Notice the headings on the left and right side of the constitutional change, item #13, both are the same: "Current Preamble". I resigned more than a year ago but FSFE is still benefiting from my attention to detail. Overall, the document is simply outrageous. While there isn't a lot of trust between Matthias and myself right now, if he publicly denounces this document, I will accept it was nothing more than a hoax. >> Ultimately, the authenticity of either document can't be confirmed >> unless they are published by FSFE. Otherwise it could be fake news. > > It could be, but then it would be wasted for what reason? To attack > your writings? I don't think so. I do not know that you said anything > so bad that somebody starts writing this type of document and making > it fake issue. It would look so genuine and then again wasted > effort. It is not balanced. > > I think that is real draft. But what is real decision, I do not know. > > I have seen many fake documents in last 17 years, and I can spot > things. I think this is genuine draft. > A hoaxer would want us to distribute a fake document. We would then lose our own credibility. Fake letters created by students changed the course of an Australian federal election: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-03-02/jeff-kennett-letter-1996/10862172 They used stolen letterhead from the office of the Victorian state premier to make it look real. >> If FSFE was to publish a set of minutes containing a malicious and >> abusive act of character assassination then it would create a lot of >> problems. > > They did not mean to publish it. > > I am sure that they have many other decisions which are not > transparently published. Obviously they publish only annual > meetings. But what about the "annualy made decisions" - those are not > published. Thus there is no transparency in FSFE. > Each year they have a weekend meeting and only publish minutes for approximately 30 minutes out of the 48 hours. >> If they are authentic, which we don't know, then the conduct of rogue >> individuals at the annual meeting is extraordinarily abusive. > > But which one? Anybody who doesn't resign. > >> Even without those circumstances, no organization would pass such a >> motion in a public meeting and record it in their minutes. > > It was not "public" meeting. You should know it better if you were in > the FSFE. > > If you know at least one decision that was not published online, then > you know that this is possible. > It is public in the sense that everybody attending the meeting knows the minutes will be published. People submit proposals for the agenda with the intention that the motion and the vote will be published. The person submitting a rogue motion does so hoping that it will be published on the FSFE web site. >> Such matters are usually handled discretely by the executive and >> under proper legal advice. > > Document looks like they wanted to handle it discreetly. > > Even if fake, it is time NOW to publish that document. > Please be careful. You risk your own credibility. If you publish them, do so with a disclaimer that their authenticity is not confirmed. The thing to do is to ask m...@fsfe.org to denounce the documents that appeared today. >> The motion in these potentially fake minutes doesn't look like the >> work of a lawyer, it looks like a vendetta sketched on the back of a >> napkin. > > I have worked with lawyers, the minutes are minutes, everybody can > write it, but the modifications in Articles look as carefully drafted. > Motion #15, the hysterical call for legal action against a volunteer does not look like the work of a legal professional. >> The only thing for FSFE to do right now is to confirm that those >> documents are fake and that no such motions were passed at the annual >> meeting. > > Can you ask them? I am asking them. > Yes, put m...@fsfe.org on CC. He is the FSFE president. Regards, Daniel
Re: Can I block this sender? Was: Re: FSFE minutes, or a vendetta?
17. Okt. 2019, 22:21 von dan...@pocock.pro: anonymous identities on this email list. We can all thank Cryptie for her leadership in the use of anonymity, she was first and I won't be the one to compromise her real name. He he, that is ironic as you told us the truth about her name already. I appreciate you so much but that is the sole activity that I did no like so much. We should all be anonymous, else social justice warriors (a.k.a. wankers) will put too much pressure on the ones who say true things. On the other hand she is part of the conspiracy against RMS and Linus and receives money by the French state and the European Union to assassinate the privacy and physical well-being of you and other truth-tellers. I cannot say how much I hate those left-terroristic governments that destroy our society. -- https://backtotheaugust.org/ ___ Discussion mailing list Discussion@lists.fsfellowship.eu https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Re: FSFE minutes, or a vendetta?
* Daniel Pocock [2019-10-18 01:28]: > The second document also appears to contain two resignation emails. > I've heard that there have actually been more resignations than > that. So you also say that those could be real. I have published few pages: https://pleroma.gnusocial.club/notice/9o1eDIfG9fZIxb2zLM on FSFE social account, nobody yet answered anything. The stamp "CONFIDENTIAL" is not real, it is placed there digitally. But could be anything. The stamp DRAFT looks more real. That knife is there, says that document was tampered by somebody. Fine. But overall it looks genuine. However, the writings and changes of Articles are carefully edited and they cannot be fake. The changes mentioned in overall document are consistent with each other. That looks as real document to me. > Ultimately, the authenticity of either document can't be confirmed > unless they are published by FSFE. Otherwise it could be fake news. It could be, but then it would be wasted for what reason? To attack your writings? I don't think so. I do not know that you said anything so bad that somebody starts writing this type of document and making it fake issue. It would look so genuine and then again wasted effort. It is not balanced. I think that is real draft. But what is real decision, I do not know. I have seen many fake documents in last 17 years, and I can spot things. I think this is genuine draft. > If FSFE was to publish a set of minutes containing a malicious and > abusive act of character assassination then it would create a lot of > problems. They did not mean to publish it. I am sure that they have many other decisions which are not transparently published. Obviously they publish only annual meetings. But what about the "annualy made decisions" - those are not published. Thus there is no transparency in FSFE. > If they are authentic, which we don't know, then the conduct of rogue > individuals at the annual meeting is extraordinarily abusive. But which one? > Even without those circumstances, no organization would pass such a > motion in a public meeting and record it in their minutes. It was not "public" meeting. You should know it better if you were in the FSFE. If you know at least one decision that was not published online, then you know that this is possible. > Such matters are usually handled discretely by the executive and > under proper legal advice. Document looks like they wanted to handle it discreetly. Even if fake, it is time NOW to publish that document. > The motion in these potentially fake minutes doesn't look like the > work of a lawyer, it looks like a vendetta sketched on the back of a > napkin. I have worked with lawyers, the minutes are minutes, everybody can write it, but the modifications in Articles look as carefully drafted. > The only thing for FSFE to do right now is to confirm that those > documents are fake and that no such motions were passed at the annual > meeting. Can you ask them? I am asking them. -- Thanks, Jean Louis ___ Discussion mailing list Discussion@lists.fsfellowship.eu https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Re: Can I block this sender? Was: Re: FSFE minutes, or a vendetta?
Oct 17, 2019, 20:04 by rol...@mxchange.org: > Is there a way where I can setup a personal (non-global) block against a > specific sender? Starting to become annoying what this one (you know who) > writes. To much BS for me. I cannot understand why people like you want to block valid opinions. I assume you mean A. Hilter. He says some strange things but he rightfully pointed out that there are dangerous people like Stehman exist who you usually don't know. You should not censor particular people who say the truth, even if it may hurt. Sometimes pain is a good cleansing mechanism for body and brain. You should try it. If you cannot hold the truth, you should leave this list. We don't need you to get rid of the scum that eradicates our dear leaders. Here, I even help you: https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/options/discussion -- https://backtotheaugust.org/ ___ Discussion mailing list Discussion@lists.fsfellowship.eu https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Re: Can I block this sender? Was: Re: FSFE minutes, or a vendetta?
On 17/10/2019 21:04, Roland Häder wrote: > Is there a way where I can setup a personal (non-global) block against a > specific sender? Starting to become anoying what this one (you know who) > writes. To much BS for me. > Great question "you know who" is somewhat ambiguous, everybody has a different perspective. As the saying goes, you can't polish a turd. But drug dealers sometimes conceal some very valuable products in those spaces. I'm simply amazed at how many FSFE GA members are operating under anonymous identities on this email list. We can all thank Cryptie for her leadership in the use of anonymity, she was first and I won't be the one to compromise her real name. Personally, I feel that your question gets to the heart of the censorship issue: it is up to each list subscriber to decide what they do and don't want to read. A moderator will always have a bias. See the very first message[1] on this list. You may be able to use a tool like procmail or the Thunderbird message filters to help you. Regards, Daniel 1. https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/pipermail/discussion/2019-May/00.html ___ Discussion mailing list Discussion@lists.fsfellowship.eu https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Re: Can I block this sender? Was: Re: FSFE minutes, or a vendetta?
On Thu, 17 Oct 2019, Roland Häder wrote: Is there a way where I can setup a personal (non-global) block against a specific sender? Starting to become anoying what this one (you know who) writes. To much BS for me. I guess the most simple way is to configure a filter rule in your e-mail client program.___ Discussion mailing list Discussion@lists.fsfellowship.eu https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Re: FSFE minutes, or a vendetta?
Oct 17, 2019, 19:57 by dan...@pocock.pro: The second document also appears to contain two resignation emails. I've heard that there have actually been more resignations than that. That is a interesting thought and I think there will be minimum 10 more who will resign within the next weeks. I cannot believe that you have no supporters within FSFE's board. All of them should resign to make clear that they belong to the side of the truth-tellers. If they are authentic, which we don't know, then the conduct of rogue individuals at the annual meeting is extraordinarily abusive. I resigned from my role at FSFE and reduced my involvement in other volunteer activities at an acute time of grief and personal tragedy. You are a hero indeed. I hope one day there will be a picture with you, RMS and Linus. I would love to have that on my working desk and perhaps more for motivation. The only thing for FSFE to do right now is to confirm that those documents are fake and that no such motions were passed at the annual meeting. If they say they are fake, do we believe them? I would say we should not, otherwise it is a bit senseless. Truth must be spoken, and we all know that leftist organizations like FSFE can never be truth-tellers. -- https://backtotheaugust.org/ ___ Discussion mailing list Discussion@lists.fsfellowship.eu https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
