[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are! But only the default 0.pfsense.pool.ntp.org server is
specified.
What I see is that my pfSense talks to a number of different time
servers and many of those looks like ordinary ADSL subscribers which
scares me a little.
That's the whole point
Hi,
How pfsense work, begin with all ports closed? And then i open the
necessary ports?
Thanks
--
--
Segurança da Informação se faz com tecnologia, processos e pessoas, e a
formação destas exige mais que uma seqüência de treinamentos. Porque você
treina macacos.
Thanks =)
it's a question levanted by staff here =)
2008/3/6, Paul M [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Jose Augusto wrote:
Hi,
How pfsense work, begin with all ports closed? And then i open the
necessary ports?
by default closed.
however, whatever rule set you choose to implement it, you should
On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 01:32:11PM +, Paul M wrote:
I too have asked him privately. I suspect he's using Lotus Notes or
something equally horrible which cannot be configured sanely!
That's what God invented webmail for.
Can the list admin get the mail system changed to strip the
The correct course of action is to boot him off on first offense.
This makes seven on my count
RB wrote:
No, really - I asked you once in private, now I ask you again in
I too have asked him privately. I suspect he's using Lotus Notes or
something equally horrible which cannot be configured sanely!
Can the list admin get the mail system changed to strip the recipient
request headers out?
Return Receipt
Your RE: [pfSense-discussion] pfSense / Time Service
document:
Bwa ha ha! Delicious, delicious irony! I knew it was inevitable
since Ryan had to read the thread at least once more before fixing
things, but it was worth it to see this one come in.
On 3/6/08, Ryan Neily [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Return Receipt
Your document: RE: [pfSense-discussion]
Sorry guys. I have unsubscribed. Hopefully this will fix things..
Ryan Neily
|
| From: |
|
--|
|Eugen Leitl
On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 02:53:19PM +, Paul M wrote:
RB wrote:
Bwa ha ha! Delicious, delicious irony! I knew it was inevitable
since Ryan had to read the thread at least once more before fixing
things, but it was worth it to see this one come in.
has he fixed things?
Just forward
Return Receipt
Your Re: [pfSense-discussion] pfSense / Time Service
document:
Eugen Leitl wrote:
On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 02:53:19PM +, Paul M wrote:
RB wrote:
Bwa ha ha! Delicious, delicious irony! I knew it was inevitable
since Ryan had to read the thread at least once more before fixing
things, but it was worth it to see this one come in.
has he fixed things?
The real problem is that the %^$%^#$ mail program I am using does not
allow you to turn of return receipts.
Anyhow, it's fixed now.You can go on complaining about something
else...
Ryan Neily
|
| From: |
|
The real problem is that the %^$%^#$ mail program I am using does not allow
you to turn of return receipts.
Corporate standards for the win! I feel for you, as your situation is
very similar to what initially drove me to use my own address versus a
corporate one.
Anyhow, it's fixed now.
Gentlemen!
I sorry to have started this Return Receipt storm.
Chris Buechler complained to me in private and asked me to turn off RR
when writing to this forum which I will of course do my outmost to
remember in the future.
Problem is that I prefer having RR on as default when doing normal
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gentlemen!
I sorry to have started this Return Receipt storm.
Chris Buechler complained to me in private and asked me to turn off RR
when writing to this forum which I will of course do my outmost to
remember in the future.
I half expected a read receipt pop up
16 matches
Mail list logo
