On Wed, 7 Dec 2005, Alon Altman wrote: > If I understand correctly, the video accessibility problem may be > relevant to deaf (or hard of hearing) people who are also > illterate or dyslexic, but sill have access to modern computing > equipment and a high-speed connection.
Or people who are more fluent in sign language than in any written language. Or people who don't type fast. Or people who don't like to type. Or people who need to hold a baby in one arm while signing with the other (and at the same time keeping the baby away from the keyboard). Or ... Or maybe just people who want to communicate using their everyday medium of communication, sign language, over a network. Why should this be treated any differently than voice? > How many of those are there anyway? I don't know. Do you? -Ron. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
