שלום עומר וכולם.
אני אישית לא בטוח בתועלת של דיבוב הרצאה. עד כמה שאני מבין, הרצאה היא
למעשה סיכום של מאמר עם היכולת להרחיב בהתאם לדרישות הקהל.
אני חושב שהערך של השאלות הנשאלות במהלך הרצאה לא בהכרח שווה את היקף
המשאבים הנדרש כדי לבצע את הדיבוב.
כאשר אני נדרשתי לחומר מהרצאות, הפקתי תועלת רבה
שלום רם-און,
קודם כל, וזה הדבר החשוב ביותר:
כל אחד לומד בסגנון אישי המותאם לו.
יש אנשים שמתאים להם ללכת להרצאות. יש אנשים שמתאים להם ללמוד לבד מספרים.
ויש אנשים שמתאים להם לפתח את הכל בראש שלהם וצריכים רק לקבל רמזים
(הפיסיקאי זוכה פרס הנובל ריצ'רד פיינמן הוא דוגמא לאדם מהסוג השלישי).
ובפרט, נובע
Omer, it sounds to me like the only objection is to the question of
motivation. I don't think anybody will mind if the software that helps
transcription merely exists and is usable by whoever may want to
contribute by using it. Then if there are good enough reasons for it to
happen, it can.
On Wed, 2006-03-22 at 12:51 +0200, Ofir Carny wrote:
I think transcribing is important, not only for human accessibility
purposes, but also for software accessibility (e.g. translation
services, web crawlers) which adds a lot of functionality. And I think
that any software that can ease this
I would like to share with you my feelings about the planned lecture's
audio recording.
From the fact that the volunteer work on textual transcript of Larry
Wall's lecture
(http://wiki.osdc.org.il/index.php/Larry_Wall_-_Present_Continous%
2C_Future_Perfect) was not finished so far, I understand
On Tue, Mar 21, 2006, Omer Zak wrote about Re: Recording the Lecture [was Re:
Date Correction [was Re: Telux: Linux Kernel Tuning and Customisation on 26
March]]:
Why should I give up my own life and spend a lot of time on those
recordings, if the mechanism which I suggested - to ask the first
On Tue, 2006-03-21 at 17:10 +0200, Nadav Har'El wrote:
On Tue, Mar 21, 2006, Omer Zak wrote about Re: Recording the Lecture [was
Re: Date Correction [was Re: Telux: Linux Kernel Tuning and Customisation
on 26 March]]:
Why should I give up my own life and spend a lot of time on those
On Tue, 2006-03-21 at 16:12 +0200, Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:
On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 02:01:46PM +0200, Omer Zak wrote:
However, introduction of audio recordings, without immediately
accompanying them with textual transcripts, has the effect of
disfranchising me and other deaf software
On Tue, 21 Mar 2006, Omer Zak wrote:
2. Money to pay for paid work transcribing lectures: from where will
the budget come? If there are more lectures than budget, how to select
which lectures to transcribe?
3. The solution which I suggest is as follows:
After the lecture is recorded, make
On Tue, 2006-03-21 at 18:27 +0200, Orna Agmon wrote:
On Tue, 21 Mar 2006, Omer Zak wrote:
2. Money to pay for paid work transcribing lectures: from where will
the budget come? If there are more lectures than budget, how to select
which lectures to transcribe?
3. The solution which I
I fully agree with Orna on this. This is against the FOSS spirit. If at
all, the government should be supplying the deaf with the tools to
transcribe audio when needed (in the US they do via relay calls). A free
software approach to this issue would be similar to what project guntenberg
uses
On Tue, 2006-03-21 at 19:33 +0200, Alon Altman wrote:
I fully agree with Orna on this. This is against the FOSS spirit. If at
all, the government should be supplying the deaf with the tools to
transcribe audio when needed (in the US they do via relay calls). A free
software approach to this
Nadav Har'El wrote:
On Tue, Mar 21, 2006, Omer Zak wrote about Re: Recording the Lecture [was Re: Date Correction
[was Re: Telux: Linux Kernel Tuning and Customisation on 26 March]]:
4. Maybe there is another solution of which I did not think?
The best thing to do is to write a Hebrew
13 matches
Mail list logo
