Re: [Neo] Confused about Neo3 optimization work

2015-08-08 Diskussionsfäden Arne Babenhauserheide
Hi,

Am Freitag, 7. August 2015, 09:59:52 schrieb Patrick Strasser:
> > I now (finally) updated the wiki site: 
> > https://wiki.neo-layout.org/wiki/EvolvedLayouts
> 
> It seems that all the layouts have the vovel on the left hand. Is the
> intentional or just incidence? Verry interresting.

that’s coincidal. There are layouts with all vowels left and others
with all vowels right. Most do this splitting (either left or right),
so I think it’s a feature of our language: switching between vowel and
consonant. And since a handswitch is the most convenient movement,
having vowels left and consonants right (or vice versa) is the easiest
way to optimize for movement.

Best wishes,
Arne

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: [Neo] Confused about Neo3 optimization work

2015-08-07 Diskussionsfäden Patrick Strasser
Hello!

Am 2015-08-04 um 23:19 schrieb Arne Babenhauserheide:

> I now (finally) updated the wiki site: 
> https://wiki.neo-layout.org/wiki/EvolvedLayouts

It seems that all the layouts have the vovel on the left hand. Is the
intentional or just incidence? Verry interresting.

LG

Patrick
-- 
Engineers motto: cheap, good, fast - choose any two
One of the lucky 10.000: http://xkcd.com/1053
Use Mail Encryption Today! PGP Key ID: 0xDF8A127E5A120903
Patrick Strasser 




Re: [Neo] Confused about Neo3 optimization work

2015-08-04 Diskussionsfäden Arne Babenhauserheide
Hi Sebastian,

The optimizer and criteria weighting changed since then, and the
results are outdated.

I now (finally) updated the wiki site: 
https://wiki.neo-layout.org/wiki/EvolvedLayouts

Best wishes,
Arne

Am Dienstag, 4. August 2015, 15:11:26 schrieb Sebastian:
> Hallo dear community!
> 
> I have the following issue:
> 
> -> Under "Evolved Layouts" we have a top-10 ranking of calculated layouts 
> (cpuesser first; the results are 3yrs old)
> 
> --> acc. to the calculations this layout performs far better than cry / 
> bone 2 / etc which are candidates for a future NEO3 release. Why is the 
> cpuesser layout not mentioned anymore? Is this due to an updated Optimizer 
> or criteria change, so the results must not be compared?
> 
> Thank you and
> best regards,
> 
> an attentive follower of the NEO project
> 
> 

--
Celebrate with ye beauty and gather yer friends for a Pirate Party!
→ http://1w6.org/english/flyerbook-rules#pirate-party ←



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


[Neo] Confused about Neo3 optimization work

2015-08-04 Diskussionsfäden Sebastian
Hallo dear community!

I have the following issue:

-> Under "Evolved Layouts" we have a top-10 ranking of calculated layouts 
(cpuesser first; the results are 3yrs old)

--> acc. to the calculations this layout performs far better than cry / 
bone 2 / etc which are candidates for a future NEO3 release. Why is the 
cpuesser layout not mentioned anymore? Is this due to an updated Optimizer 
or criteria change, so the results must not be compared?

Thank you and
best regards,

an attentive follower of the NEO project