Re: [distcc] Little or no compilation at localhost

you run distccd with on both machines? Didn't you forget to run distccd on localhost? -- Jean Delvare __ distcc mailing listhttp://distcc.samba.org/ To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/distcc

Re: [distcc] Do not allow localhost compile

have been giving it a try, patch is attached (against the latest Arch version of distcc). Seems to work just fine for me, I would appreciate if others could try it, especially people which are actually interested in this feature. Comments would be very welcome too, of course. Thanks, -- Jean

Re: [distcc] make -j N sometimes fails after a few minutes with distcc

if the errors vanish or nor. -- Jean Delvare __ distcc mailing listhttp://distcc.samba.org/ To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/distcc

Re: [distcc] discovering the distccd hosts on a DHCP LAN?

be turning to if I really wanted to host services on a dynamically-IP'd machine. Hope that helps, -- Jean Delvare __ distcc mailing listhttp://distcc.samba.org/ To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/distcc

Re: [distcc] On Style - the hosts file

much, it's really just a matter of syntax. Thanks, -- Jean Delvare __ distcc mailing listhttp://distcc.samba.org/ To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/distcc

Re: [distcc] pending patches

for this compiler anyway, so we're probably better waiting for a follow-up before we move. Improvements to distccmon-text (Eddie Parker): http://lists.samba.org/archive/distcc/2005q1/002873.html Alternative patches (Jean Delvare): http://lists.samba.org/archive/distcc/2005q1/002947.html http

Re: [distcc] On Style - the hosts file

Hi Daniel, [Jean Delvare] I would also question the interest of such an option. Was there a significant improvement when compared with a fully randomized distribution? I would think that a more simple rule would be not to randomize the first host of the list and start randomizing after

Re: [distcc] On Style - the hosts file

compared with a fully randomized distribution? I would think that a more simple rule would be not to randomize the first host of the list and start randomizing after that. Wouldn't it be sufficient? Or we could have ~/.distcc/hosts.random for randomized hosts. Just my $0.02 anyway. -- Jean

Re: [distcc] Patch?

for inclusion into distccmon-text? Thanks, -- Jean Delvare __ distcc mailing listhttp://distcc.samba.org/ To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/distcc

Re: [distcc] make install after make -j8 CC=distcc still compiles entire Linux kernel

would hopefully prevent recompilation. -- Jean Delvare __ distcc mailing listhttp://distcc.samba.org/ To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/distcc

Re: [distcc] distcc fails when building linux kernel on gentoo

them, then the jobs are distributed to versions of gcc which do not support them. You should always use the same version of the compiler accross the different systems on a build farm - or at least versions as similar as possible. Hope that helps, -- Jean Delvare __ distcc mailing list

Re: [distcc] ARM Tools / ADS (tcc tccp armcomp) porting

Hi, How do I post it? Zip the modified files and email them to you? Unified diff as generated by GNU diff -u, obviously, posted to this mailing-list so that everyone can review and enjoy. -- Jean Delvare __ distcc mailing listhttp://distcc.samba.org/ To unsubscribe or change

Re: [distcc] Patch?

implementing (1) only (since mine implements (2) more efficiently, or so I think), and addressing the points I listed above? Martin, like my patch? Thanks, -- Jean Delvare --- distcc-2.18.3/src/mon-text.c.orig 2004-10-24 07:05:49.0 +0200 +++ distcc-2.18.3/src/mon-text.c2005-02-20

Re: [distcc] Error Transport endpoint is not connected

server directly. At least this is how I understood it. HTH, -- Jean Delvare __ distcc mailing listhttp://distcc.samba.org/ To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/distcc

Re: [distcc] where does preprocessing take place

to change the code to do this, if only this is possible at all, but would benchmark any test patch you would come up with. Thanks, -- Jean Delvare __ distcc mailing listhttp://distcc.samba.org/ To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/distcc

Re: [distcc] where does preprocessing take place

become the bottleneck already)? Just a question of course, maybe there are reasons why we wouldn't win anything in doing so, that I didn't see. Thanks, -- Jean Delvare __ distcc mailing listhttp://distcc.samba.org/ To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman

Re: [distcc] where does preprocessing take place

. -- Jean Delvare __ distcc mailing listhttp://distcc.samba.org/ To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/distcc

Re: [distcc] Using distcc with a new build system

of distccmon-text itself in repeat mode would be convenient.) -- Jean Delvare http://khali.linux-fr.org/ __ distcc mailing listhttp://distcc.samba.org/ To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/distcc

Re: [distcc] new web page on supported compilers

could help make things clearer. -- Jean Delvare __ distcc mailing listhttp://distcc.samba.org/ To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/distcc

Re: [distcc] errno not reset by connect(2)

see (although I cannot test your variant until monday morning (CET)). Yours is slightly cleaner (do not check errno if no error actually occured), mine is slightly more compact (no additional variable). Both are fine with me so I would let Martin pick the variant he prefers. Thanks, -- Jean Delvare

[distcc] errno not reset by connect(2)

... */ +errno = 0; while ((connect(fd, sa, salen) == -1) errno == EINTR) ; -- Jean Delvare http://khali.linux-fr.org/ __ distcc mailing listhttp://distcc.samba.org/ To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/distcc

Re: [distcc] errno not reset by connect(2)

and that it doesn't fit in distcc's assumptions. The only point to be confirmed was on who were right, and your quotes seem to innocent my system. Let's simply apply the trivial patch I proposed and it should be fine. Thanks. -- Jean Delvare http://khali.linux-fr.org/ __ distcc mailing list

Re: [distcc] Problem with distccmon-gnome 2.18

. This is fixed in arch. I will probably do a 2.18.1 release soon to fix this and some warnings from Dmitri. Thanks a lot Martin, 2.18.1 works OK for me! :) -- Jean Delvare http://khali.linux-fr.org/ __ distcc mailing listhttp://distcc.samba.org/ To unsubscribe or change options: http

RE: [distcc] _3632_0: No such file or directory

The same (adding '\r') must be done everywhere in the file (in functions dcc_parse_ssh_host, dcc_parse_tcp_host, ...) I don't think this is the correct approach. Most likely, the file handles (or sockets, whatever) need to be open in text mode, which will do the conversion for you. I'm surprised

Re: [distcc] Problem with distccmon-gnome 2.18

Tom, could you try recompiling 2.17 on your system and tell us if it also has the same problem? Indeed, the same problem. Damn. Can you remember what changed on your system since August 1st (or whenever you compiled 2.17 at first)? -- Jean Delvare http://khali.linux-fr.org/ __ distcc

Re: [distcc] Problem with distccmon-gnome 2.18

system and tell us if it also has the same problem? At any rate, I guess we should not search for the cause in the changelog from 2.17 to 2.18. The problem has to be triggered by something outside of the distcc source tree. Too bad I have no idea what it is... -- Jean Delvare http://khali.linux

[distcc] Problem with distccmon-gnome 2.18

). So I have no idea what can be causing the problem nor how to investigate any further. Anyone else noticed the problem? Any idea what can be the cause of my trouble, or at least where I should look at? Thanks. -- Jean Delvare http://khali.linux-fr.org/ __ distcc mailing listhttp

Re: [distcc] Multiple people running distcc at once, using one DISTCC_DIR

that host list randomization is a new feature though, probably not present in 2.16, which the original poster is using. -- Jean Delvare http://khali.linux-fr.org/ __ distcc mailing listhttp://distcc.samba.org/ To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: [distcc] Multiple people running distcc at once, using one DISTCC_DIR

--- Daniel Kegel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't think you should be sharing a .distcc directory between multiple users. It's not a common configuration, and there are sure to be problems. Does the community agree? I thought this was the recommended setup. I do indeed agree :) If I

Re: [distcc] tmp file

the user applications. This is probably what you are experiencing. -- Jean Delvare http://khali.linux-fr.org/ __ distcc mailing listhttp://distcc.samba.org/ To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/distcc

distcc 2.17.1? (Was [distcc] Cross GCC for Cygwin)

. -- Jean Delvare http://khali.linux-fr.org/ __ distcc mailing listhttp://distcc.samba.org/ To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/distcc

Re: [distcc] very slow with many machines

(unless something else is saturating it at the time you run your compilation). Hope that helps, -- Jean Delvare http://khali.linux-fr.org/ __ distcc mailing listhttp://distcc.samba.org/ To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/distcc

Re: [distcc] Exploit in distcc

Google finds this attack code http://www.metasploit.com/projects/Framework/modules/exploits/distcc_exec.pm You can see it is more a matter of malice than genius. This specific one could be defeated easily. Notice how argv[N] is set to #. If nothing else, distcc could reject any command

Re: [distcc] Incorrect time stamp of generated object file when using distcc with makepp

would it influence the timestamp? I'm curious, and would appreciate if someone could explain. Thanks, -- Jean Delvare http://khali.linux-fr.org/ __ distcc mailing listhttp://distcc.samba.org/ To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/distcc

RE: [distcc] Lock before preprocess?

Time to preprocess a file is very long due to lot of inclusion of headers files, lot of use of define flags, ... And because preprocessing is done on only the host computer, this is the weak point of distcc in our project. Preprocessing time is what is limiting the speed of distributed

Re: [distcc] 2.17 bug? No dcc_trace() function/#define found (src/clinet.c)

I don't see dcc_trace anywhere. I see dcc_trace_argv, and I see rs_trace, but no dcc_trace. I'm presuming it should be rs_trace, but I figured I'd mention it on the mailing list first. Yes, thanks for reporting it. What is the status of this bug? Looks fixed to me. Is

[distcc] timeouts in 2.17

Hi all, The announcement for 2.17 mentioned the addition of timeouts on network operations. This sounds like a very interesting feature. To say the truth, this was the only feature that was still missing before I could propose distcc as replacement at my job's place for our homemade, bogus

[distcc] Job count issue

Hi all, I have been investigating an issue about job counts for the last few days. It may or may not be a problem in distcc, it's still too early to conclude, but at least it is related to distcc. Here's the problem in details: I noticed that sometimes, I would compile something using distcc,

Re: [distcc] Job count issue

On Sun, Jul 25, 2004 at 05:12:52PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote: 3* Any idea what the problem could be? How would I investigate? My guess would be that interrupting the compile caused distcc to mark one or more hosts as unresponsive, which causes distcc to temporarily ignore the host. Do you

[distcc] Default job limits in distcc.1

. Below is a trivial patch doing just that (hopefully my webmail client will not trash it). Thanks, Jean Delvare --- distcc-2.16/man/distcc.1.orig Mon May 3 02:37:10 2004 +++ distcc-2.16/man/distcc.1Fri Jul 23 12:47:04 2004 @@ -292,9 +292,9 @@ .B /LIMIT A decimal limit can be added

Re: [distcc] Default job limits in distcc.1

not much into translation. As far as I am concerned, I always use English versions (programs and documentation). Thanks, Jean Delvare __ distcc mailing listhttp://distcc.samba.org/ To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/distcc

[distcc] Greetings

using distcc. I noticed some strange behaviors from times to times, but will keep quiet until I have isolated the problems, if they do exist. I'll try to help if I can, but you may know how busy my other projects are keeping me, so I wouldn't promise anything. Thanks, Jean Delvare __ distcc mailing