Do not use distcc..
it is fast (save 50% ~60%) but very very unstable
make -j option is not supported exact multi process.
end in waste of money
my company went bankrupt because distcc
:(
- Original Message -
From: nadim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: distcc@lists.samba.org
Sent:
Hi,
I just installed distcc and run into a problem when compiling linux kernel
2.6.11. I first did a make -j8 CC=distcc. When it finished, I tried to
install the kernel using make install. However, this make install didn't
work as I expected. Instead, it triggered a recompilation of the
Hi Junfeng,
I just installed distcc and run into a problem when compiling linux kernel
2.6.11. I first did a make -j8 CC=distcc. When it finished, I tried to
install the kernel using make install. However, this make install didn't
work as I expected. Instead, it triggered a recompilation
On 17 Mar 2005, at 18:55, nadim wrote:
All my programs are targeted to linux. I will appreciate any
advise.
You'd be happier developing on a Linux box, I think,
because running your builds on Windows will be
ungodly slow even with distcc.
Nothing is less true. I use both OSes and a Win box
You must do a make -j8 CC=distcc install, too. I get around most of these issues using a wrapper script I call 'distmake'. I've attached it for people's general use.
To install the modules, you must also do a make -j8 CC=distcc modules_install before the regular install. You should, in general,
