Ian Bicking wrote:
Chris Withers wrote:
Ian Bicking wrote:
Say I have a package that represents an application. We'll call it
FooBlog. I release version 1.0. It uses the Turplango web framework
(1.5 at the time of release) and the Storchalmy ORM (0.4), and
Turplango uses HardJSON (1.2.1).
Paul Moore wrote:
My feeling, by the way, is that system packagers are the more
relevant group on Linux/Unix (where most users install Python modules
via system packages, or else they are developers)
I think this is part of why I don't understand the system packager
perspective. Developers
2008/10/10 Ian Bicking [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Paul Moore wrote:
My feeling, by the way, is that system packagers are the more
relevant group on Linux/Unix (where most users install Python modules
via system packages, or else they are developers)
I think this is part of why I don't understand
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 02:34:30PM -0400, Ian Bicking wrote:
Paul Moore wrote:
My feeling, by the way, is that system packagers are the more
relevant group on Linux/Unix (where most users install Python modules
via system packages, or else they are developers)
I think this is part of why I
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 10:56:02PM +0300, Marius Gedminas wrote:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 02:34:30PM -0400, Ian Bicking wrote:
Paul Moore wrote:
My feeling, by the way, is that system packagers are the more
relevant group on Linux/Unix (where most users install Python modules
via system
