On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 4:53 AM, Eric Lemoine
eric.lemo...@camptocamp.com wrote:
Hi
I'm currently switching to zc.buildout 1.5. I've been looking at
having a Python environment that is fully isolated from the main,
system-wide Python environment.
Can you confirm that zc.buildout 1.5
how can i get python setup.py develop or something similar with distutils2?
i'm just looking for a simple way to include a package into current
python environment while working on that package.
$ pip freeze|grep -i dist
Distutils2==1.0a3
any tips appreciated.
Aljosa Mohorovic
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 8:14 AM, Aljoša Mohorović
aljosa.mohoro...@gmail.com wrote:
how can i get python setup.py develop or something similar with distutils2?
i'm just looking for a simple way to include a package into current
python environment while working on that package
The feature is
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 10:22:58AM -0400, Jim Fulton wrote:
It occurs to me that it would be nice if we made clean Python
packages available for some of the popular Unix platforms. I'm not
sure what would be involved in doing that, from a distribution point
of view.
If you're
2010/10/28 Tarek Ziadé ziade.ta...@gmail.com:
The feature is not existing yet in distutils2. In the meantime you can
change your PYTHONPATH to include the package
is somebody working on this or it's not a priority for next milestone?
Aljosa
___
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 10:22:58AM -0400, Jim Fulton wrote:
It occurs to me that it would be nice if we made clean Python
packages available for some of the popular Unix platforms. I'm not
sure what would be
On Oct 28, 2010, at 12:08 PM, Jim Fulton wrote:
BTW, I really don't care about certain types of innovation (e.g. file
locations, wide unicode) as long as I as a developer don't feel them.
It occurs to me that it would be useful if there was a definition of a
standard Python that provided a
2010/10/28 Aljoša Mohorović aljosa.mohoro...@gmail.com:
2010/10/28 Tarek Ziadé ziade.ta...@gmail.com:
The feature is not existing yet in distutils2. In the meantime you can
change your PYTHONPATH to include the package
is somebody working on this or it's not a priority for next milestone?
Periodically, in various venues, we discuss the challenges of
deploying applications with or in spite of system packaging of Python
and system packaging philosophies.
(Note that I'm mainly talking g about deploying applications, as opposed
to individual Python packages.)
In my experience, the
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 12:08:30PM -0400, Jim Fulton wrote:
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 10:22:58AM -0400, Jim Fulton wrote:
It occurs to me that it would be nice if we made clean Python
packages available for some
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/28/2010 12:44 PM, Jim Fulton wrote:
Periodically, in various venues, we discuss the challenges of
deploying applications with or in spite of system packaging of Python
and system packaging philosophies.
(Note that I'm mainly talking g
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Barry Warsaw ba...@python.org wrote:
On Oct 28, 2010, at 12:08 PM, Jim Fulton wrote:
BTW, I really don't care about certain types of innovation (e.g. file
locations, wide unicode) as long as I as a developer don't feel them.
It occurs to me that it would be
On Oct 28, 2010, at 02:02 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
I like the idea in general, but worry that some conflicts may not be
resolvable. For instance, I don't know what goal drives system
packagers to specify UCS4 over the default UCS2, but I won't ever be
happy using a Python built that way for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/28/2010 04:50 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
On Oct 28, 2010, at 02:02 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
I like the idea in general, but worry that some conflicts may not be
resolvable. For instance, I don't know what goal drives system
packagers to
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 5:44 PM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
Heh, untar + CMMI into a non-system prefix works for me. ;)
+1 with the small addition of after making sure the dev dependencies Python
sniffs out to build modules for (zlib, crypto bits, etc.) are available.
--
Benji
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/28/2010 05:54 PM, Benji York wrote:
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 5:44 PM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
Heh, untar + CMMI into a non-system prefix works for me. ;)
+1 with the small addition of after making sure the dev dependencies
I'll probably realize what stupid thing I'm doing as soon
as I send this message, but oh well if that's what it takes ... ;)
I want to install setuptools on a centos 4.3 system, for which
the system python is 2.4 (ugh) so I've compiled and installed
python 2.6 into /usr/local. When I try
On Oct 28, 2010, at 6:08 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
Heh, agreed. That bites me on about every third machine I set up for
the first time. The Usual Suspects (TM) are whatever the local
packaging system calls the following (and their -dev or -devel packages,
if split out):
- - zlib
- -
At 06:18 PM 10/28/2010 +0200, Alan Franzoni wrote:
Hello,
lately I was thinking about writing a kind of factory method for
parsing an url and returning a resource filename or stream, something
like:
fs_resource = load_resource_filename(file:///etc/software/config.conf)
pkg_resource =
At 06:10 PM 10/28/2010 -0400, Stephen Waterbury wrote:
Any suggestions appreciated! Hope this isn't a faq that I
missed ...
I would suggest trying it with the local Python 2.4; if that works,
then your 2.6 build is likely broken in some way. (Another thing to
check would be your
20 matches
Mail list logo
