On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Marius Gedminas wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 07:40:36AM -0400, Jim Fulton wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 7:29 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
>> > On 14 March 2012 19:04, Tarek Ziadé wrote:
>> >>> Please can we have a new format that only has a Python version in th
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 07:40:36AM -0400, Jim Fulton wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 7:29 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> > On 14 March 2012 19:04, Tarek Ziadé wrote:
> >>> Please can we have a new format that only has a Python version in the
> >>> filename if it matters?
> >>
> >> isn't that supposed t
> On 14 March 2012 19:04, Tarek Ziadé wrote:
>> Why would someone create a binary release when
>> it's pure Python ?
There are a lot of users (Windows and Mac anyway) that like a nice
point+click installer, and don't know (and shouldn't have to) whether
there is any compiled code in there. It's
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 7:29 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> On 14 March 2012 19:04, Tarek Ziadé wrote:
>>> Please can we have a new format that only has a Python version in the
>>> filename if it matters?
>>
>> isn't that supposed to be the source release ?
>
> Yes, basically - at least as far as I unde
I tried and following is the output.
nitin@nitin-desktop:/opt/ros/diamondback/ros$ sudo easy_install -vv -U
rosinstall vcstools
Searching for rosinstall
Reading http://pypi.python.org/simple/rosinstall/
Download error: [Errno -2] Name or service not known -- Some packages
may not be found!
Reading
2012/3/15 PJ Eby :
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 7:29 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
>>
>> If there's a binary egg available, how do I know whether it's needed
>> without trying a source install and seeing if it works?
>
>
> The egg will have a platform string in its name in that case. Otherwise,
> it'll be j
