A friendly reminder that wheel is implemented, useful and working as long
as you are using distribute 0.6.28 or better. Qwcode's pip fork supports
it. When you install a wheel you get .dist-info and can easily have no
.egg-info in your virtualenv.
Would anyone care to lend a hand with the Sphinx A
On Feb 18, 2013 3:32 AM, "Vinay Sajip" wrote:
>
> PJ Eby telecommunity.com> writes:
>
> > Yes - it's unnecessary for library directories (e.g. stuff under
> > site-packages). You may safely remove any empty subdirectory of the
> > directories containing the .dist-info, that is a parent of any of
In article <80a14fcd-7722-437f-a030-d5a71e4f4...@spvi.com>,
Steve Spicklemire wrote:
> Aha! I think this turned out to be the trouble.
>
> THANK YOU!
Glad it helped.
> Anyway.. I appreciate your suggestion to use the oldest supported system, but
> it's getting harder to keep such system arou
Aha! I think this turned out to be the trouble.
THANK YOU!
Having said that, I didn't specify -framework Python explicitly, but distutils
put that *and* the correct '-I' (but not '-L') line for the corresponding
include directory within the correct version of the framework. I guess it was
gett
On 18 February 2013 19:56, Don Question wrote:
> lately i was wondering (again) if i should put my small python projects on
> pypi, and reevaluated (again) the required package-format. And quite frankly
> im confused (again) as so many times before. I count at least 5 major and 3
You are right, t
In article ,
Steve Spicklemire wrote:
> I'm hoping someone on the distutils list may have some hints about
> discovering the incantation necessary to produce a working boost-linked
> python extension for ptyhon.org Python-3.2.3 on MacOS 10.8.
Sorry, I don't have any experience with boost but I
I fell into this trap about a year ago, spending many hours reading
documentation and blog posts, trying to use setuptools alternatives / get
rid of setup.py. Turns out distribute + setup.py is still the most
practical way to go.
I approve of http://www.scotttorborg.com/python-packaging/ . It at l
OK, let's clear out some confusion.
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 8:56 PM, Don Question
wrote:
> * distutils
Yes, this is the basic packaging system of Python, included in the
standard library.
> * setuptools
Extends distutils with many useful functions. However it is not under
much development. Use
Hi folks,
lately i was wondering (again) if i should put my small python projects on
pypi, and reevaluated (again) the required package-format. And quite frankly
im confused (again) as so many times before. I count at least 5 major and 3
minor/alternative packaging-systems:
* distutils
* distuti
I should mention that at least one of the differences here:
aluminum:visual_common steve$ grep Indirect ~/t6.txt
Indirect symbols for (__TEXT,__symbol_stub1) 1442 entries
Indirect symbols for (__DATA,__nl_symbol_ptr) 2168 entries
Indirect symbols for (__DATA,__la_symbol_ptr) 1442 entries
Indirect
Hi Distutils Folks,
I'm hoping someone on the distutils list may have some hints about discovering
the incantation necessary to produce a working boost-linked python extension
for ptyhon.org Python-3.2.3 on MacOS 10.8.
Here's my situation. I'm attempting to help out with a wxPython port of visu
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 1:44 AM, Reinout van Rees wrote:
> On 17-02-13 03:25, Philippe Ombredanne wrote:
>>
>> The new bootstrap script for buildout 2.0 always attempt to download
>> distribute_setup.py instead if distribute is not available:
>>
>> See:https://github.com/buildout/buildout/blob/ee7
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 5:38 AM, Philippe Ombredanne
wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 2:10 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>> The latest draft of PEP 426 is up at http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0426/
> This is looking great!
>
>> License (optional)
>> --
> [...]
>> The full text of th
On 17-02-13 03:25, Philippe Ombredanne wrote:
The new bootstrap script for buildout 2.0 always attempt to download
distribute_setup.py instead if distribute is not available:
See:https://github.com/buildout/buildout/blob/ee709cfb00229fbd8fc8554db8df06a46808/bootstrap/bootstrap.py#L81
exec(url
PJ Eby telecommunity.com> writes:
> Yes - it's unnecessary for library directories (e.g. stuff under
> site-packages). You may safely remove any empty subdirectory of the
> directories containing the .dist-info, that is a parent of any of the
> files belonging to the distribution you are uninsta
15 matches
Mail list logo
