On Jul 31, 2013, at 1:38 AM, holger krekel hol...@merlinux.eu wrote:
Hi Donald,
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 14:04 -0400, Donald Stufft wrote:
On Jul 30, 2013, at 1:13 PM, PJ Eby p...@telecommunity.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 4:14 AM, Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io wrote:
Heh, I'm
On 31 July 2013 05:15, Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io wrote:
[...]
+1. This sounds like a good plan
I do not want a packaging index server to be specified by implementation,
so as
the legacy API is ported over to Warehouse a specification will be
drafted. This
spec will represent the promise
I've just started getting PyPI failures because the SSL certificate being
presented by pypi.python.org is only valid for addvocate.com. Can anyone shed
some light on this?
Regards,
Vinay Sajip
___
Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org
On Jul 31, 2013, at 5:34 AM, Vinay Sajip vinay_sa...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
I've just started getting PyPI failures because the SSL certificate being
presented by pypi.python.org is only valid for addvocate.com. Can anyone shed
some light on this?
Regards,
Vinay Sajip
On Jul 31, 2013, at 5:34 AM, Vinay Sajip vinay_sa...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
I've just started getting PyPI failures because the SSL certificate being
presented by pypi.python.org is only valid for addvocate.com. Can anyone shed
some light on this?
Regards,
Vinay Sajip
Hello Nick and the PyPI community,
This is a brief status report on the integration of PyPI and pip with TUF.
(A quick reminder: TUF is a general plug-n-play update framework
designed to introduce usable security to community software repositories
such as PyPI. If you think of PyPI as HTTP,
Hi Trishank,
thanks for the high level overview. Do you have a current web page with
more detailed technical info with respect to PyPI/TUF?
best,
holger
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 07:27 -0400, Trishank Karthik Kuppusamy wrote:
Hello Nick and the PyPI community,
This is a brief status report
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 00:15 -0400, Donald Stufft wrote:
So, in the spirit of not treating distutils-sig like an adversary, here's
the main thing I've been working on lately with regards to PyPI. None
of this is set in stone but this is the general gist of the plan for moving
things to be
Hello Holger,
On 07/31/2013 08:13 AM, holger krekel wrote:
thanks for the high level overview. Do you have a current web page with
more detailed technical info with respect to PyPI/TUF?
Good question! I think it is a good idea to put up a PyPI+pip+TUF
current status page on our web site,
On 15/07/2013 18:27, Alexis Métaireau wrote:
Hi,
I hope this is the right place to ask for this.
I would like to have a trove classifier for pelican [0] plugins. We
plan to release them on PyPI and having a classifier to distinguish
them from all the other packages sounds the way to go.
On Jul 31, 2013, at 8:11 AM, holger krekel hol...@merlinux.eu wrote:
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 00:15 -0400, Donald Stufft wrote:
So, in the spirit of not treating distutils-sig like an adversary, here's
the main thing I've been working on lately with regards to PyPI. None
of this is set in
Sorry Alexis!
I'm a little confused as to how Pelican deserves to be considered a
framework. Generally before we add a Framework classifier we need to
see a number of packages in PyPI which would have that classifier
applied to them. Can you point to such packages?
Richard
On 1 August
12 matches
Mail list logo
