Hi Donald,
On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 19:43 -0500, Donald Stufft wrote:
On Nov 13, 2014, at 9:21 PM, Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io wrote:
Starting a new thread with more explicit details at Richard’s request.
Essentially the tl;dr here is that we'll switch to using sha2 (specifically
I just noticed that pip does not support SNI (on Python 2.7.8). This is a bit
problematic for us since we use a private index on a server using SNI, and
right pip always aborts with a certificate error. I found a year old ticket
that seems related (https://github.com/pypa/pip/issues/1511
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 8:55 AM, Piotr Dobrogost
p...@lists-2014.dobrogost.net wrote:
Are there any plans to move from easy_install/eggs to pip/wheels in buildout?
Buildout doesn't really use easy_install. It uses
setuptools. Originally, I tried to use easy_install directly (and do
in some
I thought distlib was supposed to be that API... Even though pip doesn't
use it.
Though that would mean a new major version of buildout that worked on
wheels exclusively instead of eggs.
Pip itself has an internal API in the `pip.commands` package. From a casual
glance it seems usable from other
On Dec 1, 2014, at 4:25 AM, holger krekel hol...@merlinux.eu wrote:
Hi Donald,
On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 19:43 -0500, Donald Stufft wrote:
On Nov 13, 2014, at 9:21 PM, Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io wrote:
Starting a new thread with more explicit details at Richard’s request.
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 12:35 PM, Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io wrote:
On Dec 1, 2014, at 4:25 AM, holger krekel hol...@merlinux.eu wrote:
Hi Donald,
On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 19:43 -0500, Donald Stufft wrote:
On Nov 13, 2014, at 9:21 PM, Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io wrote:
Starting a new
AFAIK pip does use distlib (it is vendored by pip), but only for some ancillary
functions such as pre-release version checks.
I'm not sure it's a good idea to use pip's internal API (as it's internal, and
I don't believe it's been designed for use as a library by external code).
Regards,
Vinay
On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 12:45 -0600, Ian Cordasco wrote:
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 12:35 PM, Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io wrote:
On Dec 1, 2014, at 4:25 AM, holger krekel hol...@merlinux.eu wrote:
Hi Donald,
On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 19:43 -0500, Donald Stufft wrote:
On Nov 13, 2014,
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 3:23 PM, holger krekel hol...@merlinux.eu wrote:
On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 12:45 -0600, Ian Cordasco wrote:
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 12:35 PM, Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io wrote:
On Dec 1, 2014, at 4:25 AM, holger krekel hol...@merlinux.eu wrote:
Hi Donald,
On
On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 15:29 -0600, Ian Cordasco wrote:
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 3:23 PM, holger krekel hol...@merlinux.eu wrote:
On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 12:45 -0600, Ian Cordasco wrote:
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 12:35 PM, Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io wrote:
On Dec 1, 2014, at 4:25 AM,
Howdy all,
The Warehouse is ignoring the feature of PyPI which sets particular
versions of a package visible or not visible. It makes all versions
visible regardless.
This is a problem when, for example, a package has been uploaded but
should not be shown by default.
An example is the
On Dec 1, 2014 6:22 PM, Ben Finney ben+pyt...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
Howdy all,
The Warehouse is ignoring the feature of PyPI which sets particular
versions of a package visible or not visible. It makes all versions
visible regardless.
This is a problem when, for example, a package has
On Dec 1, 2014, at 7:21 PM, Ben Finney ben+pyt...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
Howdy all,
The Warehouse is ignoring the feature of PyPI which sets particular
versions of a package visible or not visible. It makes all versions
visible regardless.
This is a problem when, for example, a
Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io writes:
Can you go into some detail about what the use case is for having
something other than the latest version be the default version shown?
Not much detail needed: The package version was released before it was
realised that it breaks many people's systems on
On Dec 1, 2014, at 7:40 PM, Ben Finney ben+pyt...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io writes:
Can you go into some detail about what the use case is for having
something other than the latest version be the default version shown?
Not much detail needed: The package
On 1 December 2014 at 22:58, Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io wrote:
On Dec 1, 2014, at 7:40 AM, Wichert Akkerman wich...@wiggy.net wrote:
I am wondering: with Python 2.7.9 about to be released with a backport of
Python 3’s ssl module, can pip start supporting SNI without any external
On 2 December 2014 at 05:54, Vinay Sajip vinay_sa...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
AFAIK pip does use distlib (it is vendored by pip), but only for some
ancillary functions such as pre-release version checks.
The current direction things appear to be going is:
* use distlib to get a batteries included
Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io writes:
You can always remove a version from PyPI if it’s breaking things for
people.
I ond't consider that a good option, since I do want some testers to get
it from the published location.
You can also of course revert whatever changes people are being broken
On Dec 1, 2014, at 8:44 PM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2 December 2014 at 05:54, Vinay Sajip vinay_sa...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
AFAIK pip does use distlib (it is vendored by pip), but only for some
ancillary functions such as pre-release version checks.
The current direction
19 matches
Mail list logo
