On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 11:36 PM, Justin Cappos jcap...@nyu.edu wrote:
I am no expert, but I don't understand why backtracking algorithms would
to be faster than SAT, since they both potentially need to walk over the
full set of possible solutions. It is hard to reason about the cost because
I've just started monitoring this SIG to get a sense of the issues and
status of things. I've also just started working for Continuum Analytics.
Continuum has a great desire to make 'pip' work with conda packages.
Obviously, we love for users to choose the Anaconda Python distribution but
many
On May 16, 2015 11:22 AM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 11:36 PM, Justin Cappos jcap...@nyu.edu wrote:
I am no expert, but I don't understand why backtracking algorithms
would to be faster than SAT, since they both potentially need to walk over
the full
On 16 May 2015 at 20:04, David Mertz dme...@continuum.io wrote:
What would be better as a user experience would be to let users do this:
% pip install --upgrade pip
% pip install some_conda_package
Whether that second command ultimately downloads code from pyip.python.org
or from
On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 12:04 PM, David Mertz dme...@continuum.io wrote:
Continuum has a great desire to make 'pip' work with conda packages.
Obviously, we love for users to choose the Anaconda Python distribution but
many will not for a variety of reasons (many good reasons).
Hmm -- this
On 16 May 2015 at 20:04, Chris Barker chris.bar...@noaa.gov wrote:
I was referring to the SetDllDirectory API. I don't think that gets picked
up by other processes.
from:
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ms686203%28v=vs.85%29.aspx
It looks like you can add a path,
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 11:35 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 4:56 AM, Chris Barker chris.bar...@noaa.gov
wrote:
But in short -- I'm pretty sure there is a way, on all systems, to have a
standard way to build extension modules, combined with a standard
On 17 May 2015 at 00:36, Justin Cappos jcap...@nyu.edu wrote:
This only considers computation cost though. Other factors can become more
expensive than computation. For example, SAT solvers need all the rules to
consider. So a SAT solution needs to effectively download the full
dependency
On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 4:13 AM, Paul Moore p.f.mo...@gmail.com wrote:
Though it's a lot harder to provide a build environment than just the
lib to
link too .. Im going to have to think more about that...
It seems to me that the end user doesn't really have a problem here
(pip install
I am no expert, but I don't understand why backtracking algorithms would
to be faster than SAT, since they both potentially need to walk over the
full set of possible solutions. It is hard to reason about the cost because
the worst case is in theory growing exponentially in both cases.
This
On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 10:12 AM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe, but it's a problem to be solved, and the Linux distros more or
less
solve it for us, but OS-X and Windows have no such system built in (OS-X
does have Brew and macports)
Windows 10 has Chocalatey and
On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 12:40 AM, Daniel Holth dho...@gmail.com wrote:
On May 16, 2015 11:22 AM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 11:36 PM, Justin Cappos jcap...@nyu.edu wrote:
I am no expert, but I don't understand why backtracking algorithms
On May 16, 2015, at 1:24 PM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17 May 2015 at 00:36, Justin Cappos jcap...@nyu.edu wrote:
This only considers computation cost though. Other factors can become more
expensive than computation. For example, SAT solvers need all the rules to
On 16 May 2015 at 19:40, Chris Barker chris.bar...@noaa.gov wrote:
With 2., you still have the issue of DLL hell,
could you clarify a bit -- I thought that this could, at least, put a dir on
the search path that was specific to that python context. So it would
require cooperation among all
On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Paul Moore p.f.mo...@gmail.com wrote:
could you clarify a bit -- I thought that this could, at least, put a
dir on
the search path that was specific to that python context. So it would
require cooperation among all the packages being used at once, but not
On Fri, 15 May 2015, at 15:48, Donald Stufft wrote:
Hey!
Hi Donald
Ideally I hope people start to use ReadTheDocs instead of PyPI itself.
+1. Do you want to use the python.org domain (ex.
pypi.python.org/docs) or keep RTD on it own domain?
--
Sébastien Douche s...@nmeos.net
Twitter:
On 15 May 2015 at 04:01, Chris Barker chris.bar...@noaa.gov wrote:
I'm confused -- you don't want a system to be able to install ONE
version
of a lib that various python packages can all link to? That's really
the
key use-case for me
Are we talking about Python libraries accessed
On May 16, 2015, at 3:04 PM, David Mertz dme...@continuum.io wrote:
I've just started monitoring this SIG to get a sense of the issues and status
of things. I've also just started working for Continuum Analytics.
Continuum has a great desire to make 'pip' work with conda packages.
On 16 May 2015 at 11:52, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote:
On 16 May 2015 at 13:45, Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io wrote:
On May 15, 2015, at 9:22 PM, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net
wrote:
On 16 May 2015 at 11:08, Marcus Smith qwc...@gmail.com wrote:
Why not start
On 17 May 2015 06:19, Chris Barker chris.bar...@noaa.gov wrote:
indeed -- but it does have a bunch of python-specific featuresit was
built around the need to combine python with other systems.
That makes it an interesting alternative to pip on the package
*consumption* side for data
On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 4:56 AM, Chris Barker chris.bar...@noaa.gov wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 1:49 AM, Paul Moore p.f.mo...@gmail.com wrote:
On 14 May 2015 at 19:01, Chris Barker chris.bar...@noaa.gov wrote:
Ah -- here is the issue -- but I think we HAVE pretty much got what we
need
On 16 May 2015 at 04:34, Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io wrote:
So I can’t speak for ReadTheDocs, but I believe that they are considering
and/or are planning on offering arbitrary HTML uploads similarly to how
you can upload documentation to PyPI. I don’t know if this will actually
happen and
On May 16, 2015 4:55 AM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16 May 2015 at 04:34, Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io wrote:
So I can’t speak for ReadTheDocs, but I believe that they are
considering
and/or are planning on offering arbitrary HTML uploads similarly to how
you can upload
On 16 May 2015 at 07:35, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com wrote:
But in short -- I'm pretty sure there is a way, on all systems, to have a
standard way to build extension modules, combined with a standard way to
install shared libs, so that a lib can be shared among multiple packages. So
Ok, so unless someone comes out against this in the near future here are my
plans:
1. Implement the ability to delete documentation.
2. Implement the ability to add a (simple) redirect where we would essentially
just send /project/(.*) to $REDIRECT_BASE/$1.
3. Implement the ability to point
On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 4:16 PM, Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io wrote:
On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 3:03 PM, Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io wrote:
There are a few other benefits, but that’s not anything that are inherent
in the two different approaches, it’s just things that conda has that pip
is
On May 16, 2015, at 8:50 PM, Chris Barker chris.bar...@noaa.gov wrote:
On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 4:16 PM, Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io
mailto:don...@stufft.io wrote:
On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 3:03 PM, Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io
mailto:don...@stufft.io wrote:
There are a few other
Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io writes:
Ok, so unless someone comes out against this in the near future here are my
plans:
1. Implement the ability to delete documentation.
+1.
2. Implement the ability to add a (simple) redirect where we would
essentially just send /project/(.*) to
On May 16, 2015, at 9:31 PM, Ben Finney ben+pyt...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io writes:
Ok, so unless someone comes out against this in the near future here are my
plans:
1. Implement the ability to delete documentation.
+1.
2. Implement the ability to
On May 16, 2015, at 7:09 PM, Chris Barker chris.bar...@noaa.gov wrote:
On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 3:03 PM, Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io
mailto:don...@stufft.io wrote:
There are a few other benefits, but that’s not anything that are inherent in
the two different approaches, it’s just
On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 3:03 PM, Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io wrote:
There are a few other benefits, but that’s not anything that are inherent
in the two different approaches, it’s just things that conda has that pip
is planning on getting,
Huh? I'm confused -- didn't we just have a big
31 matches
Mail list logo
