Hangouts URL:
https://hangouts.google.com/call/fzzbnwpdujlkhtcv6lmcopnqj4a
Shared document for notes:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/11MZVPaayaFD3dd1NRjcKpyzlk_1IXkgQDqtkxkXuoNk/edit?usp=sharing
-n
--
Nathaniel J. Smith -- http://vorpus.org
_
On 13 October 2015 at 06:23, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Oct 12, 2015 10:16 AM, "Robert Collins"
> wrote:
...
>> So until we solve the problems related to unloading something loaded
>> into Python and loading a different version in and all the related
>> pain that can occur - I think using Python
On Oct 12, 2015 10:16 AM, "Robert Collins"
wrote:
>
> On 13 October 2015 at 02:33, Thomas Kluyver wrote:
> > On 12 October 2015 at 11:01, Robert Collins
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Python packaging config in $root/pypa.yaml
> >>
> >> Defined keys:
> >>
> >> ...
> >> build-tool:
> >> # basic comm
On 13 October 2015 at 02:33, Thomas Kluyver wrote:
> On 12 October 2015 at 11:01, Robert Collins
> wrote:
>>
>> Python packaging config in $root/pypa.yaml
>>
>> Defined keys:
>>
>> ...
>> build-tool:
>> # basic command that will spit a hunk of json back to the caller
>> defining the
>> #
On 13 October 2015 at 01:52, Daniel Holth wrote:
> I could be wrong but if egg-info actually generated a dist-info directory it
> would probably still work.
I'd worry about fallout - since pip doesn't need to change (much)
either way, I'd be inclined to be specific and allow setuptools to
merely
On 12 October 2015 at 11:01, Robert Collins
wrote:
> Python packaging config in $root/pypa.yaml
>
> Defined keys:
>
> ...
> build-tool:
> # basic command that will spit a hunk of json back to the caller
> defining the
> # commands to use with the build tool.
>
>
> Build tool output
On Oct 11, 2015 11:07 PM, "Robert Collins"
wrote:
>
> EWOW, huge thread.
>
> I've read nearly all of it but in order not to make it massively
> worse, I'm going to reply to all the points I think need raising in
> one mail :).
>
> Top level thoughts here, more point fashion with only rough editing
I could be wrong but if egg-info actually generated a dist-info directory
it would probably still work.
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 8:50 AM Thomas Kluyver wrote:
> On 12 October 2015 at 05:37, Robert Collins
> wrote:
>
>> And a bugfix :) - I didn't link to the docs for the build system
>> interface
On 12 October 2015 at 05:37, Robert Collins
wrote:
> And a bugfix :) - I didn't link to the docs for the build system
> interface we have today -
> https://pip.pypa.io/en/latest/reference/pip_install/#build-system-interface
>
I'm happy to see that the command line interface pip requires from set
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 6:37 AM, Robert Collins
wrote:
> On 12 October 2015 at 17:06, Robert Collins
> wrote:
> > EWOW, huge thread.
> >
> > I've read nearly all of it but in order not to make it massively
> > worse, I'm going to reply to all the points I think need raising in
> > one mail :).
>
On 12 October 2015 at 21:15, Thomas Kluyver wrote:
> On 12 October 2015 at 05:37, Robert Collins
> wrote:
>>
>> And a bugfix :) - I didn't link to the docs for the build system
>> interface we have today -
>>
>> https://pip.pypa.io/en/latest/reference/pip_install/#build-system-interface
>
>
> I'm
On 12 October 2015 at 07:14, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 10:55 PM, Marcus Smith wrote:
>>>
>>> So instead, the current plan is that we're going
>>> to drop the libraries inside a wheel and upload it to PyPI:
>>
>> aha... ok, now it's clearer where you're coming from.
>> but u
On 12 October 2015 at 08:23, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> I mean the distribution name - there's no way to guarantee that
> building foo-1.0.zip won't spit out bar-7.4.whl, where by "no way" I
> mean "it's literally undecideable". I mean, if someone actually did
> this it would be super weird and we w
On 12 October 2015 at 19:23, Ralf Gommers wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 6:37 AM, Robert Collins
> wrote:
>>
>> On 12 October 2015 at 17:06, Robert Collins
>> wrote:
>> > EWOW, huge thread.
>> >
>> > I've read nearly all of it but in order not to make it massively
>> > worse, I'm going to
On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 10:49 PM, Donald Stufft wrote:
> FTR, I plan on making some sort of auto builder for PyPI so it’s possible
> that we can get pip to a point where almost all things it downloads are
> binary wheels and we don’t need to worry too much about needing to optimize
> the sdist cas
On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 11:00 PM, Robert Collins
wrote:
> On 12 October 2015 at 18:36, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
[...]
>> the sdist name instead of the wheel name, it can actually do it
>
> but the sdist and the wheel have to have the same name- or do you mean
> the filename on disk, vs the distribu
16 matches
Mail list logo