On Sat, 14 Nov 2015 13:48:51 -0500, Alexander Walters
wrote:
> I perhaps can support added dialogs to IDLE to manage packages (having
> it shell out to pip, if no api is forthcoming), but I don't think I can
> support having the repl inside of IDLE intercept pip's command line
> syntax and do
I perhaps can support added dialogs to IDLE to manage packages (having
it shell out to pip, if no api is forthcoming), but I don't think I can
support having the repl inside of IDLE intercept pip's command line
syntax and do anything OTHER than giving a better error message.
On 11/14/2015 06:3
On 14 Nov 2015 11:12, "Paul Moore" wrote:
>
> On 13 November 2015 at 23:38, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> > But details of R's execution model make this easier to do.
>
> Indeed. I don't know how R works, but Python's module caching
> behaviour would mean this would be full of surprising and confusing
On 13 November 2015 at 23:38, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> But details of R's execution model make this easier to do.
Indeed. I don't know how R works, but Python's module caching
behaviour would mean this would be full of surprising and confusing
corner cases ("I upgraded but I'm still getting the o
