On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 9:31 AM, Thomas Kluyver wrote:
> Are we content to say that sys.path includes the source directory where
> the hook is run? Shall I prepare a PR against the PEP for that?
It doesn't matter whether sys.path includes the source directory when
the hook is run. At that point th
Works for me
El mar., 1 de ago. de 2017 11:32, Thomas Kluyver
escribió:
> Are we content to say that sys.path includes the source directory where
> the hook is run? Shall I prepare a PR against the PEP for that?
>
> On Sun, Jul 30, 2017, at 02:12 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> > On 30 July 2017 at 02
Are we content to say that sys.path includes the source directory where
the hook is run? Shall I prepare a PR against the PEP for that?
On Sun, Jul 30, 2017, at 02:12 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On 30 July 2017 at 02:46, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> > Or am I worrying about a non-issue and it's fine if