On Oct 16, 2009, at 3:56 PM, exar...@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
Buildbots seem to be in short supply though they should be easy
enough to come by in this day and age of penny-an-hour cloud
computing.
I think I'll see if maybe I can just whip up something about this...
Not sure if you're aw
On 06:33 pm, sstein...@gmail.com wrote:
On Oct 16, 2009, at 2:09 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
sstein...@gmail.com wrote:
On Oct 16, 2009, at 12:59 PM, Lennart Regebro wrote:
I'm going to cross-post this to the distutils list as well. If the
idea is to
On Oct 16, 2009, at 2:09 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
sstein...@gmail.com wrote:
On Oct 16, 2009, at 12:59 PM, Lennart Regebro wrote:
I'm going to cross-post this to the distutils list as well. If the
idea is to stabilize Distribute, get some tests in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
sstein...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Oct 16, 2009, at 12:59 PM, Lennart Regebro wrote:
>>> I'm going to cross-post this to the distutils list as well. If the
>>> idea is
>>> to stabilize Distribute, get some tests in place, etc. then this
>>> method of
On Oct 16, 2009, at 12:59 PM, Lennart Regebro wrote:
I'm going to cross-post this to the distutils list as well. If the
idea is
to stabilize Distribute, get some tests in place, etc. then this
method of
distribution (running 2to3 in situ, as it were) is not the correct
way to
do it from
2009/10/16 sstein...@gmail.com :
> Doesn't that also mean that the Python 3 version of Distribute is generated
> live on the installation system?
That is absolutely true.
> That doesn't seem right because that
> leaves the possibility that the code generated by 2to3 is different from the
> code t
On Oct 16, 2009, at 12:25 PM, Brandon Craig Rhodes wrote:
Jannis Leidel writes:
That'd be very much appreciated, I'm sure the experience of the
distribute people would be helpful, too.
I'm not sure I quite approve of their approach, since it makes
installing Distribute under Python 3 take a
