On 18 February 2013 19:56, Don Question wrote:
> lately i was wondering (again) if i should put my small python projects on
> pypi, and reevaluated (again) the required package-format. And quite frankly
> im confused (again) as so many times before. I count at least 5 major and 3
You are right, t
I fell into this trap about a year ago, spending many hours reading
documentation and blog posts, trying to use setuptools alternatives / get
rid of setup.py. Turns out distribute + setup.py is still the most
practical way to go.
I approve of http://www.scotttorborg.com/python-packaging/ . It at l
OK, let's clear out some confusion.
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 8:56 PM, Don Question
wrote:
> * distutils
Yes, this is the basic packaging system of Python, included in the
standard library.
> * setuptools
Extends distutils with many useful functions. However it is not under
much development. Use
Hi folks,
lately i was wondering (again) if i should put my small python projects on
pypi, and reevaluated (again) the required package-format. And quite frankly
im confused (again) as so many times before. I count at least 5 major and 3
minor/alternative packaging-systems:
* distutils
* distuti
