[Distutils] PEP-459 feedback from openSUSE packaging

2014-02-04 Thread Sascha Peilicke
Hi guys, a colleague of mine hinted me to Nick's plea for feedback on various PEPs from other distros perspectives. I will provide some general remarks first and latter comment at least PEP-459. So for openSUSE (and SLES), we automate Python package generation as much as possible. For that

Re: [Distutils] PEP-459 feedback from openSUSE packaging

2014-02-04 Thread Marius Gedminas
On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 12:43:40PM +0100, Sascha Peilicke wrote: The 'license' metadata tag is causing the most issues for us. A perceived 50% just put GPL in there. Which GPL version? GPL-only or actually LGPL?. FWIW you can sometimes get more detailed information from the classifiers:

Re: [Distutils] PEP-459 feedback from openSUSE packaging

2014-02-04 Thread Daniel Holth
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 9:02 AM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote: On 4 February 2014 21:43, Sascha Peilicke sasc...@gmx.de wrote: Hi guys, a colleague of mine hinted me to Nick's plea for feedback on various PEPs from other distros perspectives. Thanks! Happy to see my linux.conf.au

Re: [Distutils] PEP-459 feedback from openSUSE packaging

2014-02-04 Thread Nick Coghlan
On 4 February 2014 21:43, Sascha Peilicke sasc...@gmx.de wrote: Hi guys, a colleague of mine hinted me to Nick's plea for feedback on various PEPs from other distros perspectives. Thanks! Happy to see my linux.conf.au presentation bearing fruit :) I will provide some general remarks first

Re: [Distutils] PEP-459 feedback from openSUSE packaging

2014-02-04 Thread Nick Coghlan
On 5 February 2014 00:05, Daniel Holth dho...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 9:02 AM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote: Oh, I hadn't seen SPDX before - very interesting. I'm wondering if it may be a better fit for the PyPI Trove classifiers though - then it wouldn't even need to

Re: [Distutils] PEP-459 feedback from openSUSE packaging

2014-02-04 Thread Sascha Peilicke
On Wednesday 05 February 2014 00:18:41 Nick Coghlan wrote: On 5 February 2014 00:05, Daniel Holth dho...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 9:02 AM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote: Oh, I hadn't seen SPDX before - very interesting. I'm wondering if it may be a better fit for the

Re: [Distutils] PEP-459 feedback from openSUSE packaging

2014-02-04 Thread Sascha Peilicke
On Tuesday 04 February 2014 15:42:45 Marius Gedminas wrote: On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 12:43:40PM +0100, Sascha Peilicke wrote: The 'license' metadata tag is causing the most issues for us. A perceived 50% just put GPL in there. Which GPL version? GPL-only or actually LGPL?. FWIW you can

Re: [Distutils] PEP-459 feedback from openSUSE packaging

2014-02-04 Thread Sascha Peilicke
On Wednesday 05 February 2014 00:02:08 Nick Coghlan wrote: On 4 February 2014 21:43, Sascha Peilicke sasc...@gmx.de wrote: Hi guys, a colleague of mine hinted me to Nick's plea for feedback on various PEPs from other distros perspectives. Thanks! Happy to see my linux.conf.au