On 15 March 2017 at 02:05, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> Having special metadata for "sdist creation-time dependencies" strikes
> me as papering over the needless complexity of the current system by
> adding more complexity on top. I can see how it'd have some short-term
> benefits
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 12:34 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On 14 March 2017 at 09:41, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 7:55 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>> > On 11 March 2017 at 00:52, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>>
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 7:55 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On 11 March 2017 at 00:52, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 1:26 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>> > Hi folks,
>> >
>> > After a few years of dormancy, I've finally moved
On 11 March 2017 at 14:17, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On 11 March 2017 at 07:03, Daniel Holth wrote:
>
>> You lost me a bit at 'extra sets'. FYI it is already possible to depend
>> on your own extras in another extra.
>>
>> Extra pseudo code:
>> spampackage
>>
On 11 March 2017 at 07:03, Daniel Holth wrote:
> You lost me a bit at 'extra sets'. FYI it is already possible to depend on
> your own extras in another extra.
>
> Extra pseudo code:
> spampackage
> extra['spam'] = 'spampackage[eggs]'
> extra['eggs'] = ...
>
Oh, nice. In that
You lost me a bit at 'extra sets'. FYI it is already possible to depend on
your own extras in another extra.
Extra pseudo code:
spampackage
extra['spam'] = 'spampackage[eggs]'
extra['eggs'] = ...
+1 on extras. The extras feature has the wonderful property that people
understand it. Lots of
On Fri, 10 Mar 2017 at 07:56 Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On 11 March 2017 at 00:52, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 1:26 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > After a few years of dormancy, I've finally moved the
On 11 March 2017 at 00:52, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 1:26 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > After a few years of dormancy, I've finally moved the metadata 2.0
> > specification back to Draft status:
> >
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 1:26 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> After a few years of dormancy, I've finally moved the metadata 2.0
> specification back to Draft status:
> https://github.com/python/peps/commit/8ae8b612d4ea8b3bf5d8a7b795ae8aec48bbb7a3
We have lots of
Hi folks,
After a few years of dormancy, I've finally moved the metadata 2.0
specification back to Draft status:
https://github.com/python/peps/commit/8ae8b612d4ea8b3bf5d8a7b795ae8aec48bbb7a3
Based on our last round of discussion, I've culled a lot of the complexity
around dependency
10 matches
Mail list logo