[Distutils] Re: proposing Python package index upload API spec (potential PEP)

I don't have time to work on this and hope someone else can pick it up - https://github.com/pypa/packaging-problems/issues/128 is a good issue to use to keep track. -- Distutils-SIG mailing list -- distutils-sig@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to distutils-sig-le...@python.org

[Distutils] Re: proposing Python package index upload API spec (potential PEP)

I move to define PyPA and Warehouse HTTP APIs with OpenAPI definitions. https://swagger.io/specification/ https://github.com/OAI/OpenAPI-Specification/blob/OpenAPI.next/versions/3.0.0.md > OPENAPI SPECIFICATION > > The OpenAPI specification (formerly known as the Swagger Specification) is a

[Distutils] Re: proposing Python package index upload API spec (potential PEP)

On 9 May 2018 at 04:09, Sumana Harihareswara wrote: > As a new Twine maintainer I've been running into questions like: > > * Now that Warehouse doesn't use "register" anymore, can we deprecate it > from distutils, setuptools, and twine? Are any other package indexes or >

[Distutils] Re: proposing Python package index upload API spec (potential PEP)

I like this practice of writing specifications to better document interfaces that already exist. However, in this case I wonder if it would be better to spend the time defining a new, simpler API instead? I think we're currently in a position where most tools could use a new upload API