Re: [Distutils] Travis-CI is not open source. Was: Current Python packaging status (from my point of view)

2016-11-03 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Nov 03, 2016, at 12:54 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote: >This is also an area where I'm fine with recommending freemium >solutions if they're the lowest barrier to entry option for new users, >and "Use GitHub + Travis CI" qualifies on that front. I won't rehash the GitHub/GitLab debate, but in some of

Re: [Distutils] Travis-CI is not open source. Was: Current Python packaging status (from my point of view)

2016-11-02 Thread Nick Coghlan
On 2 November 2016 at 23:13, Ian Cordasco wrote: > On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 1:00 AM, Thomas Güttler > wrote: >> I see an other hurdle. travis-ci is very widespread, but AFAIK it is not >> open source: >> >>https://travis-ci.com/plans >

Re: [Distutils] Travis-CI is not open source. Was: Current Python packaging status (from my point of view)

2016-11-02 Thread Ian Cordasco
On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 1:00 AM, Thomas Güttler wrote: > I see an other hurdle. travis-ci is very widespread, but AFAIK it is not open > source: > >https://travis-ci.com/plans It is open source: https://github.com/travis-ci Sadly, the infrastructure it takes

[Distutils] Travis-CI is not open source. Was: Current Python packaging status (from my point of view)

2016-11-02 Thread Thomas Güttler
Am 01.11.2016 um 17:50 schrieb Matthew Brett: > Hi, > > On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 10:35 AM, Thomas Güttler > wrote: >> >> >> Am 01.11.2016 um 10:50 schrieb Nick Coghlan: >>> >>> On 1 November 2016 at 17:30, Thomas Güttler >>> wrote: