Re: [Distutils] pipenv use cases

2018-01-17 Thread Nick Coghlan
On 17 January 2018 at 12:51, Nick Coghlan wrote: > I think tox provides a good precedent for what's needed when it comes > to effectively targeting multiple environments: you want a venv per > target environment per project, not just a venv per project. After double-checking

Re: [Distutils] pipenv use cases

2018-01-16 Thread Nick Coghlan
On 17 January 2018 at 05:21, Brett Cannon wrote: > Well, technically we need consensus so we agree that what goes up on > packaging.python.org makes sense; I'm not worried about the whole world. :) > I mean I'm not even after specifically recommended testing practices and > such

Re: [Distutils] pipenv use cases

2018-01-16 Thread Brett Cannon
On Tue, 16 Jan 2018 at 10:43 Paul Moore wrote: > On 16 January 2018 at 17:36, Brett Cannon wrote: > > Is there a library developer workflow that's being promoted then > somewhere > > that I'm just not finding? Or does that need to be written for > >

Re: [Distutils] pipenv use cases

2018-01-16 Thread Paul Moore
On 16 January 2018 at 17:36, Brett Cannon wrote: > Is there a library developer workflow that's being promoted then somewhere > that I'm just not finding? Or does that need to be written for > packaging.python.org (which I might be willing to write; see below for > motivation)?

Re: [Distutils] pipenv use cases

2018-01-16 Thread Brett Cannon
On Tue, 16 Jan 2018 at 02:45 Nick Coghlan wrote: > On 16 January 2018 at 20:22, Paul Moore wrote: > > On 16 January 2018 at 10:03, Nick Coghlan wrote: > >> On 16 January 2018 at 19:47, Paul Moore wrote: > >>> I

Re: [Distutils] pipenv use cases

2018-01-16 Thread Paul Moore
On 16 January 2018 at 10:44, Nick Coghlan wrote: > Yes, that's deliberate. We want to target app developers as our > initial audience, since library and framework developers have > different needs (and for folks just starting out with library > development, pipenv + the

Re: [Distutils] pipenv use cases

2018-01-16 Thread Nick Coghlan
On 16 January 2018 at 20:22, Paul Moore wrote: > On 16 January 2018 at 10:03, Nick Coghlan wrote: >> On 16 January 2018 at 19:47, Paul Moore wrote: >>> I think that if the pipenv docs had some better guidance on what use >>> cases it

[Distutils] pipenv use cases

2018-01-16 Thread Paul Moore
On 16 January 2018 at 10:03, Nick Coghlan wrote: > On 16 January 2018 at 19:47, Paul Moore wrote: >> I think that if the pipenv docs had some better guidance on what use >> cases it was intended to cover (and what it wasn't, in relation to the >> broader