Le 23 mars 2013 à 08:40, Václav Šmilauer a écrit :
>> I was pointed to an interesting resource:
>> http://www.lfd.uci.edu/~gohlke/pythonlibs/ (The security issues with that
>> arrangement are non-trivial, but the convenience factor is huge)
> That webpage saved me a lot of headache with packa
I was pointed to an interesting resource:
http://www.lfd.uci.edu/~gohlke/pythonlibs/ (The security issues with
that arrangement are non-trivial, but the convenience factor is huge)
That webpage saved me a lot of headache with packages I was not able to
build under Windows (with mingw64). I conta
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> On 20 March 2013 18:29, Donald Stufft wrote:
>> Why can't unofficial binaries just use a separate index? e.g. Christoph can
>> just make an index with his binaries.
>>
>> This solution also works well if someone wants to maintain a curated PyP
On 20 March 2013 18:29, Donald Stufft wrote:
> Why can't unofficial binaries just use a separate index? e.g. Christoph can
> just make an index with his binaries.
>
> This solution also works well if someone wants to maintain a curated PyPI.
The only real issue I know of is hosting. I've thought
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/20/2013 06:13 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
> Another nice tool would be some sort of Windows build farm, where
> projects could submit a sdist and it would build wheels for a list of
> supported Python versions and architectures. That wouldn't work f
On Mar 20, 2013, at 12:31 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 9:03 AM, Steve Dower
> wrote:
>>> From: Nick Coghlan [mailto:ncogh...@gmail.com]
>>> [snip]
>>>
>>> I was pointed to an interesting resource:
>>> http://www.lfd.uci.edu/~gohlke/pythonlibs/
>>>
>>> (The security issue
On Mar 20, 2013, at 12:45 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> On 20 March 2013 16:31, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>> Then the pip developers, for example, could say "we trust Christoph to
>> make our Windows installers", and grant him repackager access so he
>> could upload the binaries for secure redistribution f
On 20 March 2013 16:31, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> Then the pip developers, for example, could say "we trust Christoph to
> make our Windows installers", and grant him repackager access so he
> could upload the binaries for secure redistribution from PyPI rather
> than needing to host them himself.
An
On 03/20/2013 04:42 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 3:13 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
On 19 March 2013 16:21, Steve Dower wrote:
As I understand, the issue is the same as between different versions of Python
and comes down to not being able to assume a compiler on Windows machines.
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 9:03 AM, Steve Dower wrote:
>> From: Nick Coghlan [mailto:ncogh...@gmail.com]
>> [snip]
>>
>> I was pointed to an interesting resource:
>> http://www.lfd.uci.edu/~gohlke/pythonlibs/
>>
>> (The security issues with that arrangement are non-trivial, but the
>> convenience fac
> From: Nick Coghlan [mailto:ncogh...@gmail.com]
> [snip]
>
> I was pointed to an interesting resource:
> http://www.lfd.uci.edu/~gohlke/pythonlibs/
>
> (The security issues with that arrangement are non-trivial, but the
> convenience factor is huge)
FWIW, one of the guys on our team has met with
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 3:13 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
> On 19 March 2013 16:21, Steve Dower wrote:
>> As I understand, the issue is the same as between different versions of
>> Python and comes down to not being able to assume a compiler on Windows
>> machines. It's easy to make a source file that
On 19 March 2013 16:21, Steve Dower wrote:
> As I understand, the issue is the same as between different versions of
> Python and comes down to not being able to assume a compiler on Windows
> machines. It's easy to make a source file that will compile for any ABI and
> platform, but distributi
Welcome Steve! I really enjoyed your lightning talk (and would like to
apologize for my audible "WHAT!?!" reaction when I heard the title as
"Debugging Python with Microsoft Visual Studio" :)
Welcome to the community, I've also been lurking here from some time,
hoping to see where I can lend a ha
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Steve Dower wrote:
> Bitbucket is starting to get some love here, and we've been pushing to get
> Mercurial on equal standing with Git internally. Right now, our small Python
> team isn't influential enough to get a commitment to a testing service, but
> there's
> From: Jim Fulton
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 12:34 PM, Steve Dower
> wrote:
> > I just joined up after the various discussions at PyCon and wanted to
> > say hi. (If you were also there and want to put a face/voice to the
> > name, I did the Visual Studio demo at one of the lightning talks.)
>
>
On Mar 19, 2013, at 11:57 AM, Jim Fulton wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 12:34 PM, Steve Dower
> wrote:
>> I just joined up after the various discussions at PyCon and wanted to say
>> hi. (If you were also there and want to put a face/voice to the name, I did
>> the Visual Studio demo at one
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 12:34 PM, Steve Dower wrote:
> I just joined up after the various discussions at PyCon and wanted to say
> hi. (If you were also there and want to put a face/voice to the name, I did
> the Visual Studio demo at one of the lightning talks.)
That was a very cool demo.
> The
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Steve Dower wrote:
> I expect I’ll mainly be lurking until I can be useful, which is why I wanted
> to start with this post. I’m pretty good with Windows, and I have direct
> access to all the experts and internal mailing lists. So just shout out when
> something c
On 2013-03-18 16:34:25 +, Steve Dower said:
Hi all
I just joined up after the various discussions at PyCon and wanted to
say hi. (If you were also there and want to put a face/voice to the
name, I did the Visual Studio demo at one of the lightning talks.)
The main reason I want to get
Hi all
I just joined up after the various discussions at PyCon and wanted to say hi.
(If you were also there and want to put a face/voice to the name, I did the
Visual Studio demo at one of the lightning talks.)
The main reason I want to get involved is the openly acknowledged lack of
Windows
21 matches
Mail list logo
