On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 8:15 AM, David Cournapeau
wrote:
> The SDK scripts are indeed a bit broken, but it is possible to detect them
> automatically in a way that is similar to what was done for MSVC 2008.
>
> I know that for a fact because I ported the python distutils MSVC
> detection to scons
2014-09-25 0:09 GMT+02:00 Paul Moore :
> On 24 September 2014 22:58, Olivier Grisel wrote:
>> Under which path?
>
> It's now documented in
> http://www.appveyor.com/docs/installed-software, but C:\PythonXY and
> C:\PythonXY-x64.
Nice, thanks: I will try it now.
--
Olivier
http://twitter.com/ogr
2014-09-24 23:52 GMT+02:00 Paul Moore :
> On 24 September 2014 03:45, Jonathan J. Helmus wrote:
>> Some of us from the Scientific Python side of development have been
>> using appveyor to build Windows wheels for a few projects. A demo from one
>> of developers of scikit-learn gives a good overvi
It seems to work, I merged the change in the master of
python-appveyor-demo. Thanks!
--
Olivier
___
Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
On 26 Sep 2014 01:15, "David Cournapeau" wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 7:49 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
>>
>> On 24 September 2014 17:24, Chris Barker wrote:
>> > Thanks -- that would be great. But really, why is this so hard? Win64
is
>> > essentially One platform, and the freely available S
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 7:49 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> On 24 September 2014 17:24, Chris Barker wrote:
> > Thanks -- that would be great. But really, why is this so hard? Win64 is
> > essentially One platform, and the freely available SDK is ONE compiler
> > environment.
>
> If only that were true
On 24 September 2014 22:58, Olivier Grisel wrote:
> Under which path?
It's now documented in
http://www.appveyor.com/docs/installed-software, but C:\PythonXY and
C:\PythonXY-x64.
> Could you please issue a PR to:
> https://github.com/ogrisel/python-appveyor-demo
>
> to show how to leverage pre-i
On 24 September 2014 03:45, Jonathan J. Helmus wrote:
> Some of us from the Scientific Python side of development have been
> using appveyor to build Windows wheels for a few projects. A demo from one
> of developers of scikit-learn gives a good overview of the process we have
> been using [1].
On 24 September 2014 21:04, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
> Am 24.09.14 08:41, schrieb Paul Moore:
>> On 24 September 2014 07:14, wrote:
>>> Zitat von Paul Moore :
>>>
Can anyone give me some advice, please? I am trying to build
extensions on Windows 64-bit, using the free Windows SDK compi
Am 24.09.14 08:41, schrieb Paul Moore:
> On 24 September 2014 07:14, wrote:
>> Zitat von Paul Moore :
>>
>>> Can anyone give me some advice, please? I am trying to build
>>> extensions on Windows 64-bit, using the free Windows SDK compilers.
>>
>> Can you please be more specific? What SDK, and wh
Chris Barker wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 6:55 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
>> Thanks for the pointer. (Also thanks to Allen Riddell). I'll take a
>> look. Ideally, what I'd like to do is write something up to help
>> non-Windows experts get things up and running, so this will be very
>> useful.
>
>
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 11:49 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
> > essentially One platform, and the freely available SDK is ONE compiler
> > environment.
>
> If only that were true :-)
>
> What I've found is:
>
> 1. Different SDKs are needed for Python 2.7 and 3.3+ (the VS2008/VS2010
> split)
>
well, yeah
On 24 September 2014 20:02, Chris Barker wrote:
>> t's getting a lot better, and once we start using MSVC 2012 or later
>> (i.e., Python 3.5+), the express editions include 64-bit support out
>> of the box, which makes most of the problems go away.
>
> Sure, but is there something we can do with t
On 24 September 2014 17:24, Chris Barker wrote:
> Thanks -- that would be great. But really, why is this so hard? Win64 is
> essentially One platform, and the freely available SDK is ONE compiler
> environment.
If only that were true :-)
What I've found is:
1. Different SDKs are needed for Pyth
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 6:55 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
> Thanks for the pointer. (Also thanks to Allen Riddell). I'll take a
> look. Ideally, what I'd like to do is write something up to help
> non-Windows experts get things up and running, so this will be very
> useful.
>
Thanks -- that would be gr
On 24 September 2014 03:45, Jonathan J. Helmus wrote:
> Some of us from the Scientific Python side of development have been
> using appveyor to build Windows wheels for a few projects. A demo from one
> of developers of scikit-learn gives a good overview of the process we have
> been using [1
On 9/23/2014 5:42 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
Can anyone give me some advice, please? I am trying to build
extensions on Windows 64-bit, using the free Windows SDK compilers.
But I can't find any official documentation on how to do this, and
everything I have tried so far has failed in frustrating ways
Hi Paul,
I don't know how Olivier Grisel did it, but I can testify it does build
extensions for Windows (32bit and 64bit) using appveyor.
https://github.com/ogrisel/python-appveyor-demo/
Best wishes,
Allen
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014, at 06:42 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> Can anyone give me some advice, p
On 24 September 2014 07:14, wrote:
> Zitat von Paul Moore :
>
>> Can anyone give me some advice, please? I am trying to build
>> extensions on Windows 64-bit, using the free Windows SDK compilers.
>
> Can you please be more specific? What SDK, and what free compilers?
> The bug report is about VS
Zitat von Paul Moore :
Can anyone give me some advice, please? I am trying to build
extensions on Windows 64-bit, using the free Windows SDK compilers.
Can you please be more specific? What SDK, and what free compilers?
The bug report is about VS Express, not the SDK compilers.
Two question
We're very close to having some good news, but unfortunately, that's all I can
say right now. Expect a more significant email/announcement from me in the next
couple of weeks. (Distutils will hear it first and get the most detailed info.)
Sent from my Windows Phone
__
21 matches
Mail list logo
