On 18 February 2018 at 18:06, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On 18 February 2018 at 03:48, Lele Gaifax wrote:
>> Nathaniel Smith writes:
>>
>>> What do you mean by a "spam package"? I guess it might be covered
>>> under this section:
>>> https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0541/#invalid-projects
>>>
>>
On 18 February 2018 at 03:48, Lele Gaifax wrote:
> Nathaniel Smith writes:
>
>> What do you mean by a "spam package"? I guess it might be covered
>> under this section:
>> https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0541/#invalid-projects
>>
>> -n
>
> Today lots of packages like the following appeared
Nathaniel Smith writes:
> What do you mean by a "spam package"? I guess it might be covered
> under this section:
> https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0541/#invalid-projects
>
> -n
Today lots of packages like the following appeared on PyPI:
https://pypi.python.org/pypi/Kim-Kardashian-Hollywo
On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 2:39 PM, Matt Gieger wrote:
> I would like to see a clause added to the "Ivalid Package" section of PEP541
> that allows some mechanism for other pypi users to mark a package as spam.
> Every day i see more spam packages added to pypi and currently the only way
> to get the
I don't know if it would be worth the effort, but I wonder if a Stack
Overflow-esque rep system for packages would work. In a perfect world, I'm
sure, but maybe not so much in ours.
-W
On Feb 16, 2018 6:24 PM, "Matt Gieger" wrote:
> I would like to see a clause added to the "Ivalid Package" sec
