Phillip J. Eby wrote:
At 01:11 PM 1/5/2007 -0500, Jim Fulton wrote:
Phillip J. Eby wrote:
...
Why can't an entry point invoke a test loader itself?
This seems much simpler and more straightforward to me.
Because that requires you to write code for something that can
adequately be expressed
Phillip J. Eby wrote:
At 10:14 AM 1/22/2007 -0500, Jim Fulton wrote:
I'd rather let people use whatever framework
they want to do this and to control this from Python.
The approach I suggested certainly allows that to happen,
I know. That's why I wouldn't object to it.
Jim
--
Jim Fulton
Hello all. I'm the primary author of nose. Michal Kwiatkowski was kind
enough to point me to this thread, and I wanted to chime in with a few
questions and answers. Apologies for pulling things from various parts
of the thread together, I didn't want to send multiple replies all
covering the same
At 06:05 PM 1/8/2007 +, John J Lee wrote:
On Mon, 8 Jan 2007, David Fraser wrote:
[...]
So I need to go and code a test enumerator for py.test to discover tests
within eggs (which is possible)
[...]
Or (for new code) use nose, which AIUI is intended to be pretty much
py.test implemented
David Fraser wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
Here is a rough draft proposal for declaring tests in eggs:
Introduction
Software packages should have automated tests. Consumers of
packages will often want to run these tests. Tools should be able to
do this automatically. This
At 08:46 AM 1/5/2007 -0500, Jim Fulton wrote:
Here is a rough draft proposal for declaring tests in eggs:
Introduction
Software packages should have automated tests. Consumers of
packages will often want to run these tests. Tools should be able to
do this automatically. This
At 01:11 PM 1/5/2007 -0500, Jim Fulton wrote:
Phillip J. Eby wrote:
...
Why can't an entry point invoke a test loader itself?
This seems much simpler and more straightforward to me.
Because that requires you to write code for something that can adequately
be expressed through an existing
