Philip, I've now modified the latest setuptools (0.6c5) so that the egg_info
command respects package_data and exclude_package_data when creating its
sources manifest (and thus influencing sdist's choice of files). Does this
sound like the right approach to you (I figured sdist should base its cho
On Sat, 03 Feb 2007 17:03:27 +0100, Phillip J. Eby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> At 12:48 PM 2/3/2007 +0100, Arve Knudsen wrote:
>> Funny, I seem to recall having raised the same issue, but not receiving
>> much in way of an answer. Glad to see it's being taken care of at least.
>
> Um, it's not
At 12:48 PM 2/3/2007 +0100, Arve Knudsen wrote:
>Funny, I seem to recall having raised the same issue, but not receiving
>much in way of an answer. Glad to see it's being taken care of at least.
Um, it's not being "taken care of". As I said, "a patch would go a long
way towards getting it in."
Funny, I seem to recall having raised the same issue, but not receiving much
in way of an answer. Glad to see it's being taken care of at least.
Arve
On 2/2/07, Phillip J. Eby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At 09:33 AM 1/22/2007 -0500, Jim Fulton wrote:
>It appears that the sdist command doesn't c
At 09:33 AM 1/22/2007 -0500, Jim Fulton wrote:
>It appears that the sdist command doesn't consult the data passed
>in the package_data option to setup. I want to name data
>that isn't under version control for inclusion. Because
>sdist doesn't pay attention to package_data, the data I'm
>naming i
