Re: [Distutils] a patch for distutils + gcc + linux, that was never apply, yet will solve many problems.

2006-07-11 Thread Jorge Vargas
noone cares about this? it's a bug so simple to fixOn 6/30/06, Jorge Vargas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello everyone I did a package for gentoo (ebuild) a while ago and it has a C/C++ extension, to compile agains a gecko-compliant mozilla product. Long story short our solution (build agains

Re: [Distutils] Mystery solved

2006-07-11 Thread Jim Fulton
On Jul 11, 2006, at 11:25 AM, Phillip J. Eby wrote: At 03:54 AM 7/11/2006 -0400, Jim Fulton wrote: On Jul 10, 2006, at 6:22 PM, Phillip J. Eby wrote: Here's the problem. Reducing everything to info messages means there's effectively no control over output detail. I generally use

Re: [Distutils] Mystery solved

2006-07-11 Thread Jim Fulton
On Jul 11, 2006, at 2:07 PM, Phillip J. Eby wrote: At 11:50 AM 7/11/2006 -0400, Jim Fulton wrote: OK that's an interesting point wrt possible misspellings. If you can find the package via the find links, but not via the index, that seems to me to be a pretty good indication that this is not

[Distutils] setuptools 0.6b4 released

2006-07-11 Thread Phillip J. Eby
I have just released version 0.6b4 of setuptools, the last beta release of setuptools 0.6. Please upgrade and test at your earliest convenience, as I would like to issue a release candidate version next week. Changes include numerous bug fixes and tweaks for corner cases in easy_install

Re: [Distutils] setuptools 0.6b4 released

2006-07-11 Thread Bob Ippolito
On Jul 11, 2006, at 12:12 PM, Phillip J. Eby wrote: Last, but not least, the ability was added to turn off SVN revision numbers or dates from the command line, so that you don't have to edit setup.cfg in order to issue a release. Would've been convenient if you said what the option