New submission from Ned Deily:
The current installation instructions for "Unix-based Systems including Mac OS
X" do not work on vanilla OS X systems because OS X does not ship with "wget".
It does, however, ship with "curl". (The Distribute web page had been updated
a long time ago to use "c
Hi. Not sure who this should go to, but it would be really good if we
could get a prominent notice on the old setuptools tracker (at
bugs.python.org), specifically on the issue creation screen, to inform
people that this tracker is only for setuptools 0.6, and that issues
for later versions should
I filed the request on the metatracker:
http://psf.upfronthosting.co.za/roundup/meta/issue522
___
Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> I filed the request on the metatracker:
> http://psf.upfronthosting.co.za/roundup/meta/issue522
Thanks! That should keep me from having to keep telling people their
princess is in another castle. ;-)
Hello,
We've got a pretty specific setup where various Python scripts
in /usr/bin are symlinked to a common wrapper. For example:
/usr/bin/easy_install -> python-exec
As a result, calling 'setup.py install' in a package that installs
setuptools' legacy script wrappers (e.g. setuptools itself)
On 08/05/2013 02:29 PM, Donald Stufft wrote:
> Just to give you a response. There are currently discussions going on
> about deprecating the official public mirroring infrastructure.
Thank you! I didn't even realized that :-P
___
Distutils-SIG maillist
On 4 August 2013 21:12, Michał Górny wrote:
> I'm willing to write a patch. Please just tell me which solution would
> you prefer.
The standard library has switched to atomic replacement for writing
.pyc files, which seems like the appropriate solution for script
writing as well (note that os.ren
On 6 August 2013 14:24, Hexchain Tong wrote:
> On 08/05/2013 02:29 PM, Donald Stufft wrote:
>> Just to give you a response. There are currently discussions going on
>> about deprecating the official public mirroring infrastructure.
>
> Thank you! I didn't even realized that :-P
Those discussions
On 5 August 2013 08:25, Donald Stufft wrote:
> Here's my PEP for Deprecating and Removing the Official Public Mirrors
>
> It's source is at:
> https://github.com/dstufft/peps/blob/master/mirror-removal.rst
Donald's proposal is now PEP 449: http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0449/
Cheers,
Nick.
Hi,
looks like I'm late to the party to figure out that I'm going to be hurt again.
I'd like to suggest explicitly considering what is going to break due
to this and how much work you are forcefully inflicting on others. My
whole experience around the packaging (distribute/setuptools) and
mir
Two more things:
why is the CDN not suffering from the security problems you describe
for the mirrors?
a) Fastly seems to be the one owning the certificate for
pypi.python.org. What?!?
b) What does stop Fastly from introducing incorrect/rogue code in
package downloads?
Christian
__
On Aug 5, 2013, at 11:11 PM, Christian Theune wrote:
> Two more things:
>
> why is the CDN not suffering from the security problems you describe for the
> mirrors?
>
> a) Fastly seems to be the one owning the certificate for pypi.python.org.
> What?!?
They have a delegated SAN for it, which
On Aug 6, 2013, at 2:31 AM, Noah Kantrowitz wrote:
>
> On Aug 5, 2013, at 11:11 PM, Christian Theune wrote:
>
>> Two more things:
>>
>> why is the CDN not suffering from the security problems you describe for the
>> mirrors?
>>
>> a) Fastly seems to be the one owning the certificate for py
On Aug 5, 2013, at 11:09 PM, Christian Theune wrote:
> Hi,
>
> looks like I'm late to the party to figure out that I'm going to be hurt
> again.
>
> I'd like to suggest explicitly considering what is going to break due to this
> and how much work you are forcefully inflicting on others. My w
On Aug 6, 2013, at 2:49 AM, Noah Kantrowitz wrote:
> I am also hoping that pypi-mirrors.org will continue to operate as a
> community project (side note, I would be happy to assist with hosting for it
> if Ken reads this list and if thats a concern of his) and that the mirror
> operators can
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 23:31 -0700, Noah Kantrowitz wrote:
> On Aug 5, 2013, at 11:11 PM, Christian Theune wrote:
>
> > Two more things:
> >
> > why is the CDN not suffering from the security problems you describe for
> > the mirrors?
> >
> > a) Fastly seems to be the one owning the certifica
16 matches
Mail list logo
