Hi there,
Normally setuptools is installed system-wide. When you install an egg
using easy_install, the egg itself can count on setuptools being
available, and use for instance its resource management API and
namespace package marking facility. It therefore is unnecessary to users
to mark
On 9/19/06, Martijn Faassen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Normally setuptools is installed system-wide. When you install an egg
using easy_install, the egg itself can count on setuptools being
available, and use for instance its resource management API and
namespace package marking facility. It
On Sep 19, 2006, at 5:43 AM, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Hi there,
Normally setuptools is installed system-wide. When you install an egg
using easy_install, the egg itself can count on setuptools being
available, and use for instance its resource management API and
namespace package marking
At 03:10 PM 9/19/2006 +1000, John Machin wrote:
Hello all,
Example below, with distutils setup of same package under Python 2.5 for
comparison. Two problems:
(1) Path of source file is part only of the path from the *development*
machine and gives no clue as to where the egg is located on the
Well, it looks like Sourceforge has found yet another way to mess with
easy_install's ability to download from their mirrors. :( Specifically,
they are not keeping the dl.sourceforge.net A list up-to-date, so
easy_install's attempts to just use simple round-robin DNS aren't always
working.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Fulton wrote:
These downsides are, in practice, pretty minor. My main objection is
that I don't like encouraging people to be sloppy about
dependencies. The counter argument, of course, is that the standard
library is an implicit
At 02:59 PM 9/19/2006 -0400, Matt Good wrote:
On Windows easy_install trac fails with the error:
trac-0.10b1.win32.exe is not a valid distutils Windows .exe
http://trac.edgewall.org/ticket/3750
The problem is with easy_install locating the config information
embedded in the file. The following
Phillip J. Eby wrote:
Anybody have any thoughts on this?
I wrote a bit of code for my raging dormouse downloader which follows
links on the sourceforge pages until you get to the real data.
would that be helpful?
---eric
___
Distutils-SIG
On Sep 19, 2006, at 11:51 AM, Phillip J. Eby wrote:
Well, it looks like Sourceforge has found yet another way to mess with
easy_install's ability to download from their mirrors. :
( Specifically,
they are not keeping the dl.sourceforge.net A list up-to-date, so
easy_install's attempts to
At 04:49 PM 9/19/2006 -0400, Kevin Dangoor wrote:
On Sep 19, 2006, at 11:51 AM, Phillip J. Eby wrote:
Well, it looks like Sourceforge has found yet another way to mess with
easy_install's ability to download from their mirrors. :
( Specifically,
they are not keeping the
10 matches
Mail list logo
