On 15 September 2016 at 01:31, Paul Moore wrote:
> On 13 September 2016 at 23:55, Donald Stufft wrote:
>> Perhaps a better idea would be to add some smarts to the REPL (but not to
>> Python itself) that would detect something like:
>>
> pip install
>>
>> And print a better error message that
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016, at 04:31 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> Of course, it doesn't solve the problem of a user who doesn't know
> what a "shell prompt" is...
Especially since the interactive Python interpreter is also a shell
prompt. The title of an IDLE window on my system is "Python 3.5.2 Shell"
;-).
On 13 September 2016 at 23:55, Donald Stufft wrote:
> Perhaps a better idea would be to add some smarts to the REPL (but not to
> Python itself) that would detect something like:
>
pip install
>
> And print a better error message that gives a better indication about what’s
> gone wrong besi
On 14 September 2016 at 22:27, Marius Gedminas wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 06:55:49PM -0400, Donald Stufft wrote:
>> >>> pip install
>>
>> And print a better error message that gives a better indication about what’s
>> gone wrong besides a SyntaxError?
>
> This way you could also make
>
>
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 06:55:49PM -0400, Donald Stufft wrote:
> >>> pip install
>
> And print a better error message that gives a better indication about what’s
> gone wrong besides a SyntaxError?
This way you could also make
>>> exit
work like people expect it to work, without the ().
Mar
On 14 September 2016 at 21:43, Donald Stufft wrote:
>
>> On Sep 13, 2016, at 7:06 PM, Steve Dower wrote:
>>
>> This is exactly the argument I was expecting when I said "those who want it
>> to be perfect in every scenario"
>
> FWIW I don’t have a strong feeling on whether we should add it or not
> On Sep 13, 2016, at 7:06 PM, Steve Dower wrote:
>
> This is exactly the argument I was expecting when I said "those who want it
> to be perfect in every scenario"
FWIW I don’t have a strong feeling on whether we should add it or not. I
haven’t been a beginner in a long time and I am not ve
On 14 September 2016 at 18:02, Paul Moore wrote:
> On 13 September 2016 at 23:55, Donald Stufft wrote:
>> The 90% case works when it’s *only* pure python and there’s no
>> upgrading/downgrading involved, however you can’t control whether there are
>> going to be upgrades/downgrades or not when
Hi Leonardo,
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 05:48:33PM -0300, Leonardo Rochael Almeida wrote:
> Hi Sandro,
>
> I don't know what your previous setup did, but in your current setup, your
> `buildout.cfg` is not configured to take your `setup.py` into account in
> any way.
>
> In the `eggs` setting, only
On 13 September 2016 at 23:55, Donald Stufft wrote:
> The 90% case works when it’s *only* pure python and there’s no
> upgrading/downgrading involved, however you can’t control whether there are
> going to be upgrades/downgrades or not when dependencies are in play because
> of ==, >=, >, <, <=
10 matches
Mail list logo