On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 13 Sep 2014 00:20, Paul Moore p.f.mo...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, it sounds like things are getting complex here and I'm not sure I
follow why. At the moment, the metadata for a distribution is
generated when
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 1:56 PM, Xavier Fernandez
wrote:
> +1 also.
> This whole double requirement feels over-complicated for what seems like a
> rather small usecase: it would be interesting to have a few stats on the
> number of packages concerned by this pinning
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 4:21 PM, Donald Stufft <don...@stufft.io> wrote:
>
> On Feb 23, 2017, at 4:51 PM, C Anthony Risinger <anth...@xtfx.me> wrote:
>
> The distlib solver would bind up from impossible constraints, yet every
> time, pip found a way to "power throu
On Jul 10, 2017 8:59 AM, "Nick Coghlan" wrote:
On 10 July 2017 at 22:08, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> On 2017-07-10 20:33:16 +1000 (+1000), Nick Coghlan wrote:
> [...]
>> we don't really *want* folks to be adding generated files to their
>> sdist that they
On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 3:58 PM, Thomas Kluyver wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 2, 2017, at 06:14 PM, Donald Stufft wrote:
>
> The steps here would basically be (for building from something that isn’t
> already a .tar.gz or a .whl):
>
>
> That sounds OK to me. I think the only
On Jun 3, 2017 4:47 AM, "Paul Moore" <p.f.mo...@gmail.com> wrote:
On 3 June 2017 at 04:53, C Anthony Risinger <c...@anthonyrisinger.com> wrote:
> I want to make sure I understand what I'd need to do, as a user, in a post
> PEP 517 world. Say I wanted to accomplis
On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 1:22 PM, Donald Stufft <don...@stufft.io> wrote:
>
> On Jun 1, 2017, at 2:12 PM, C Anthony Risinger <c...@anthonyrisinger.com>
> wrote:
>
> Because the build itself can output additional source files, that may be
> desirable to include in an
On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 5:34 AM, Donald Stufft wrote:
>
> On Jun 1, 2017, at 3:44 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
>
> On 1 June 2017 at 01:08, Donald Stufft wrote:
>
> A sdist is a .tar.gz or a .zip file with a directory structure like (along
>
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 8:53 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On 13 June 2017 at 19:44, Thomas Kluyver wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 13, 2017, at 02:27 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>
> > I've updated the PR to specify zip archives for build_wheel and .tar.gz
> > archives
On Aug 26, 2017 2:17 PM, "Nathaniel Smith" wrote:
> [removed Guido from CC]
>
> On Aug 26, 2017 02:29, "Paul Moore" wrote:
>
> On 26 August 2017 at 03:17, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> > In pretty much any other context, if you have an
On Aug 26, 2017 5:13 PM, "Nathaniel Smith" <n...@pobox.com> wrote:
On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 1:47 PM, C Anthony Risinger
<c...@anthonyrisinger.com> wrote:
> On Aug 26, 2017 2:17 PM, "Nathaniel Smith" <n...@pobox.com> wrote:
>>
>> [removed Gu
On Aug 26, 2017 5:13 PM, "Nathaniel Smith" <n...@pobox.com> wrote:
On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 1:47 PM, C Anthony Risinger
<c...@anthonyrisinger.com> wrote:
> On Aug 26, 2017 2:17 PM, "Nathaniel Smith" <n...@pobox.com> wrote:
>>
>> [removed Gu
On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 11:18 PM, xoviat wrote:
> > and they do not appear to receive the source or wheel directories.
>
> The source directory is the current directory, if I am not mistaken.
>
Oh right right, for some reason I was reading the `build_*` hooks as
receiving the
On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 9:00 PM, Nathaniel Smith <n...@pobox.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 6:30 PM, C Anthony Risinger
> <c...@anthonyrisinger.com> wrote:
> > On Aug 26, 2017 5:13 PM, "Nathaniel Smith" <n...@pobox.com> wrote:
> >
> >
On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 11:05 PM, C Anthony Risinger <c...@anthonyrisinger.com>
wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 9:00 PM, Nathaniel Smith <n...@pobox.com> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 6:30 PM, C Anthony Risinger
>> <c...@anthonyrisinger.com> wrote:
>
Do these kind of issues ever linger on unreasonably, or do enough
voluneteers step up to keep them low? Do you expire that label after a few
months?
I don't have any feedback on your actual request, I'm mostly curious of the
process/interplay around feeding new users work without introduce
RUN --mount needs a magic comment to opt into experimental syntax:
# syntax=docker/dockerfile:experimental
https://github.com/moby/buildkit/blob/master/frontend/dockerfile/docs/experimental.md
but AFAIK, was designed for this purpose, among others.
Thanks,
On Tue, May 7, 2019, 11:33 AM Daniel
17 matches
Mail list logo