That is a good presentation! I found this too:
http://us.pycon.org/TX2007/PythonEggsCreation . I remember going to the egg
talk at PyCon this year, but I don't remember if there were slides or not?
On 7/4/07, Andreas Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--On 2. Juli 2007 09:45:00 -0500 Ian Bick
uld be the final straw for some new programmer to
Python!
Noah Gift
___
Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
egg(1) is probably the best choice IMO. It doesn't conflict with any
other existing *nix command that I can tell, and I can't think of a
better command for dealing with Python eggs. It's immediately
evocative. Now that I think about it, maybe it was 'egg' that you
wanted to reserve. I like '
On 7/23/07, Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jul 23, 2007, at 2:58 PM, Benji York wrote:
> Martin v. Löwis wrote:
>> And where somewhat slower could be "practically not noticable".
>
> Perhaps it /could/ be, but isn't currently. For example, updating
> one piece of software I have wit
On 7/24/07, Phillip J. Eby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 08:54 PM 7/24/2007 +0200, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
> > >> Right. However, if setuptools would stop making case insensitive
> > >> lookups to the index, lookups to unregistered packages would become
> > >> more efficient.
> > >
> > > I'm not s
On 7/24/07, "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Would it be a bad idea to suggest the case insensitive lookup happen
> > against a local flat file that gets diff'd from PyPI? Then only the
> > culprit gets punished using their own CPU :)
>
> What does it mean to "diff a flat file from
My real motive is selfishness. I like that easy_install in not case
sensitive, as I and other people I am helping to learn Python. I just
hope that doesn't go away. My suggestion is mored geared toward, how
do I "keep" that feature :)
> no intuition for, perhaps because English is not my native
On 7/24/07, Phillip J. Eby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 04:37 PM 7/24/2007 -0400, Noah Gift wrote:
> >The basic algorithm is that a local index of PyPi could be kept in one
> >file. If an incorrect search was made, the first action to occur
> >would be to check if
On 7/24/07, Phillip J. Eby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 06:30 PM 7/24/2007 -0400, Noah Gift wrote:
> >Does this mean it is also easy to point to another local repository
> >that is available via NFS? I guess a local http mirror would work
> >just as well, if y
>
>
> I did find one recent argument for revisiting that decision, which also
> provides an alternate easy_install-compatible setup.py:
>
> http://jannisleidel.com/2007/11/using-django-with-setuptools/
>
>
> Tres.
I also like Ian's suggestion:
With a little hack you can use setuptools with distu
I am attaching a thread I started privately with Ian. The question is
multi-part and somewhat complicated so please be patient.
Background:
I am running python2.5.1, the system python, i.e., default on
Leopard: /System/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.5/bin/
python2.5
I have
On Jan 3, 2008, at 10:15 PM, Jeff Rush wrote:
> Phillip J. Eby wrote:
>>
>> In some alternate universe in which I have the funding (and therefore
>> time) to actually work on setuptools 0.7 and "nest", this and many
>> other issues would certainly be fixable.
>
> Sometimes you just have to ask.
I am trying to get egg generation entry points integrated with
building RPM's, and hopefully debian packages too. I haven't had much
luck finding any documentation on this though. My specific question is:
Can I use:
python2.5 ./setup.py bdist_rpm --binary-only --release=py25 --python=/
usr
On Jan 17, 2008, at 9:32 AM, Phillip J. Eby wrote:
> At 04:16 AM 1/17/2008 -0500, Noah Gift wrote:
>> I am trying to get egg generation entry points integrated with
>> building RPM's, and hopefully debian packages too. I haven't had
>> much
>> luck fin
setup(name='liten',
version='0.1.3',
description='a de-duplication command line tool',
long_description="This command line tool will examine a file
system and \
report back duplicates using a md5 checksum hash algorithm.",
author='No
>>>
>> In order to create an egg, to my knowledge, you create a build/lib
>> directory and place your scripts or library inside, then run
>> setup.py bdist_egg.
>
> Where did you get that knowledge? We should correct whatever source
> you got that from, because that is absolutely *not* the w
s an official ambassador, I would love to
talk to that person, to make sure I do it justice. That particular
chapter will cover eggs, virtualenv, and buildout, so I pretty excited
about it, although is the toughest chapter in the book so far.
Noah Gift
___
Thanks guys. I have sent you both emails offline.
On Feb 10, 2008, at 3:33 PM, zooko wrote:
>
> On Feb 10, 2008, at 12:14 PM, Jim Fulton wrote:
>
>>
>> On Feb 10, 2008, at 2:01 PM, Noah Gift wrote:
>>> In reference to this rather long discussion. I would love t
Has anyone created a command line tool, using optparse, that
dynamically creates options from available eggs/plugins? I have a
need to create such a tool, and was looking for an example.
Noah Gift
___
Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG
On Feb 20, 2008, at 8:13 PM, Michael Hoffman wrote:
> Noah Gift wrote:
>> Has anyone created a command line tool, using optparse, that
>> dynamically creates options from available eggs/plugins? I have a
>> need to create such a tool, and was looking for an example.
>
architecture. If you work at a Python centric company
and would like to be profiled in an O'Reilly book on your use of eggs,
please contact me as well.
Noah Gift
___
Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org
http://mail.python.org/ma
I am getting the following behavior when using virtualenv to
easy_install ZODB3.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:10256][J:0]# virtualenv --no-site-packages zodbENV
New python executable in zodbENV/bin/python
Installing setuptools..done.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:10257][J:0]# zodbENV/bin/easy_i
ot get any
error message when I uploaded to the cheeseshop, and I just missed the
minor formatting error when I was viewing the converted HTML document
I used to preview what I created.
Noah Gift / http://noahgift.com
___
Distutils-SIG maillist -
don't think it is a client-side job.
>
> In any case you can test your long_description field like this:
>
> $ python setup.py --long-description | rst2html.py --strict > /dev/null
>
> If something goes wrong in the conversion you'll get a warning here
>
> On
I work off of a rather large NFS infrastructure where thousands of
machines are constantly doing things, and recently I discovered a few
things about both setuptools and standard Python lookup that are
causing problems.
I use nosetests, and noticed that it can take up to 10 seconds to 60
seconds t
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 6:55 AM, P.J. Eby wrote:
> At 02:23 PM 4/7/2009 -0400, Jim Fulton wrote:
>
>> On Apr 7, 2009, at 9:28 AM, P.J. Eby wrote:
>>
>>> At 11:54 PM 4/7/2009 +1200, Noah Gift wrote:
>>>>
>>>> 1. In the case of entry points for s
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 7:44 PM, Marius Gedminas wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 02:23:50PM -0400, Jim Fulton wrote:
>> On Apr 7, 2009, at 9:28 AM, P.J. Eby wrote:
>>> At 11:54 PM 4/7/2009 +1200, Noah Gift wrote:
>>>> 1. In the case of entry points for setuptools,
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 8:55 PM, Tarek Ziadé wrote:
> 2009/5/5 P.J. Eby :
>> At 06:57 PM 5/4/2009 -0500, Ian Bicking wrote:
>>>
>>> * I'm uncomfortable with the way entry points are scanned. I haven't
>>> looked close enough to back it up with numbers, but I think there's a
>>> noticeable perform
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 7:18 AM, P.J. Eby wrote:
> At 08:28 PM 5/6/2009 +0200, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
>>
>> Doug Hellmann wrote:
>> > On May 6, 2009, at 1:46 PM, P.J. Eby wrote:
>> >
>> >> At 10:59 AM 5/6/2009 -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> On May 5, 2009, at 10:50 PM, P.J. Eby wrote:
>
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Eric Smith wrote:
> Paul Moore wrote:
>>
>> 2009/5/7 Tres Seaver :
>>>
>>> Eric Smith wrote:
Yes. It creates a .exe wrapper [1]. By using entry points, I don't need
to care what the target system is. Also, /usr/bin/env might invoke the
wrong pyt
resending, as I accidently only sent to PJE
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 11:48 AM, Noah Gift wrote:
> On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 11:24 AM, P.J. Eby wrote:
>> At 10:21 AM 5/8/2009 +1200, Noah Gift wrote:
>>>
>>> 1. Different versions of Python conflict with previous versions of
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 10:48 AM, P.J. Eby wrote:
> At 11:38 PM 5/14/2009 +0200, Tarek Ziadé wrote:
>
>> That happened because I got a bit lost in the way finders were working
>> in setuptools, which seemed
>> a bit over-engineered at that time to me (but I might end up changing
>> my mind at sim
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 12:59 PM, P.J. Eby wrote:
> At 08:34 PM 5/18/2009 -0400, David Lyon wrote:
>
>> Why not keep the .EGG_INFO files in the site-packages directory?
>>
>
> That's where they go. Each installed project has its own .egg-info
> subdirectory containing the listed files. See the
33 matches
Mail list logo
