[Distutils] Re: Setuptools adopts distutils

On Jul 13, 2020, at 11:36, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 7/13/20 4:26 PM, Paul Ganssle wrote: >> I don't think setuptools actually /does/ rely on the distutils from the >> standard library. >> >> One of the first things setuptools does is replace the distutils module >> in sys.modules with

[Distutils] Re: Setuptools adopts distutils

On 7/13/20 4:26 PM, Paul Ganssle wrote: > I don't think setuptools actually /does/ rely on the distutils from the > standard library. > > One of the first things setuptools does is replace the distutils module > in sys.modules with setuptools._distutils >

[Distutils] Re: Setuptools adopts distutils

I don't think setuptools actually /does/ rely on the distutils from the standard library. One of the first things setuptools does is replace the distutils module in sys.modules with setuptools._distutils

[Distutils] Re: Setuptools adopts distutils

On 7/3/20 5:18 PM, Jason R. Coombs wrote: > I’m pleased to announce the release of Setuptools 48, which adopts the > distutils codebase from CPython per > pypa/setuptools#417 and >

[Distutils] Re: Setuptools adopts distutils

Indeed – this is major step forward! On 3.7.2020 18.59, Paul Moore wrote: Awesome! Congratulations on achieving this :-) Paul On Fri, 3 Jul 2020 at 16:26, Jason R. Coombs wrote: I’m pleased to announce the release of Setuptools 48, which adopts the distutils codebase from CPython per

[Distutils] Re: Setuptools adopts distutils

Awesome! Congratulations on achieving this :-) Paul On Fri, 3 Jul 2020 at 16:26, Jason R. Coombs wrote: > > I’m pleased to announce the release of Setuptools 48, which adopts the > distutils codebase from CPython per pypa/setuptools#417 and > pypa/packaging-problems#127. > > Given the amount