Re: [Distutils] license for setuptools

2016-08-17 Thread Ian Cordasco
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 7:35 AM, Marinier, Claude <claude.marin...@lmco.com> wrote: >> Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 02:45:20 + >> From: Eric Dill <thediz...@gmail.com> >> Subject: Re: [Distutils] license for setuptools >> >> Hi Claude, >> >>

Re: [Distutils] license for setuptools

2016-08-17 Thread Marinier, Claude
> Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 02:45:20 + > From: Eric Dill <thediz...@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [Distutils] license for setuptools > > Hi Claude, > > There was a recent discussion of the lack of a license file in setuptools > here: https://github.com/pypa/setuptools/is

Re: [Distutils] license for setuptools

2016-08-14 Thread Nick Coghlan
On 13 Aug 2016 04:53, "Nick Timkovich" wrote: > > Might be wandering away from simply tacking on a license, but some related legalese: Is there some canned contributor license agreement (CLA) that could also be applied to make clear that contributors must license their

Re: [Distutils] license for setuptools

2016-08-12 Thread Glyph Lefkowitz
Yes, it's called "the apache license" - and I'm pretty sure setuptools rejected requiring that for good reason :-). CLAs are a much bigger issue and are generally quite controversial. Having one is nice if you need to do some kind of legal action but they are also a big impediment to

Re: [Distutils] license for setuptools

2016-08-12 Thread Nick Timkovich
Might be wandering away from simply tacking on a license, but some related legalese: Is there some canned contributor license agreement (CLA) that could also be applied to make clear that contributors must license their contributions to the project(s) in kind? Python has it's own (

Re: [Distutils] license for setuptools

2016-08-12 Thread Glyph Lefkowitz
Thanks for submitting this PR, Ian! :) > On Aug 12, 2016, at 6:24 AM, Ian Cordasco wrote: > > Thanks for that Geoffrey. There's a PR to add it as Jason decided to > accept it. I think we can all relax now. Okay? > > On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 8:00 AM, Geoffrey Spear

Re: [Distutils] license for setuptools

2016-08-12 Thread Chris Barker
Sorry for the noise -- I was way too late to this game -- blib in my email, I guess. -CHB On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 10:01 AM, Chris Barker wrote: > it looks like the OP is looking for the license to setuptools, not > matplotlib. > > (MPL's licence file is here:

Re: [Distutils] license for setuptools

2016-08-12 Thread Ian Cordasco
Thanks for that Geoffrey. There's a PR to add it as Jason decided to accept it. I think we can all relax now. Okay? On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 8:00 AM, Geoffrey Spear wrote: > It seems a bit silly to claim that a license that contains the sentence "The > above copyright notice

Re: [Distutils] license for setuptools

2016-08-12 Thread Geoffrey Spear
It seems a bit silly to claim that a license that contains the sentence "The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software" shouldn't have a copy included with the software it applies to since it literally says you need

Re: [Distutils] license for setuptools

2016-08-12 Thread Eric Dill
Hi Claude, There was a recent discussion of the lack of a license file in setuptools here: https://github.com/pypa/setuptools/issues/612 and another important discussion here: https://github.com/pypa/setuptools/issues/132. This is probably the most relevant quotable bit from those two issues,

Re: [Distutils] license for setuptools

2016-08-12 Thread Ian Cordasco
It seems that in our attempt to help Claude, both Glyph and I have found: https://github.com/pypa/setuptools/issues/612 On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 11:11 PM, Glyph wrote: > The OP specifically asked about setuptools, which is on-topic. In large > corporate environments it

Re: [Distutils] license for setuptools

2016-08-11 Thread Glyph
The OP specifically asked about setuptools, which is on-topic. In large corporate environments it is standard to have a process that evaluates every single dependency, so setuptools does end up in the bucket with matplotlib since you need it to install. > On Aug 11, 2016, at 8:36 PM, Noah

Re: [Distutils] license for setuptools

2016-08-11 Thread James Bennett
I think the question was really about setuptools, which does not have a license file in its repository: https://github.com/pypa/setuptools On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 8:36 PM, Noah Kantrowitz wrote: > Hi there, this list is for the discussion of Python's core packaging tools >

Re: [Distutils] license for setuptools

2016-08-11 Thread Noah Kantrowitz
Hi there, this list is for the discussion of Python's core packaging tools like distutils. We have no control over the packages made or distributed with them. You would have to contact the matplotlib authors, not us. --Noah > On Aug 12, 2016, at 7:51 AM, Marinier, Claude

[Distutils] license for setuptools

2016-08-11 Thread Marinier, Claude
Good afternoon (well it's afternoon here in the EDT zone), I am in the process of requesting the installation of Python 3 with matplotlib. The company needs to approve licenses but I cannot find the license for setuptools. The description here says it