Hi folks, thanks for this dialogue and for holding this space. Last week
was very 'head down' for my day job, so I am later to the conversations.
Some thoughts on a way forward:
- *Research : *Building an action research and qualitative feedback loop
could help build trust. I'll reach out
Thanks everyone for the follow on discussion. Please keep it going!
I had promised a next action myself to digest and post to OSMF wiki, including
some next steps that others can take up. But I ran out of time, and that's not
going to happen for another 1.5 weeks, I'm going offline for the
Hi all,
4) Some aspects of the diversity discussion foreground northern/western
participation channels by (for example) wondering why other communities
aren't participating in Talk@, SOTM, or other locations. I’m interested
in trying to flip this question to ask why core board and community
Thanks for leading these two meetings, Mikel. I appreciate that you’re taking
this on even as you clearly communicate that you’d like for some outside the
board to lead!
I participated in the first time slot. A few observations:
1) It was 100% a white/tech participation list, and I’d like to
There’s really no good time that works universally. These won’t be the only
meetings or way to get involved, they’re just to get things moving.
Mikel
On Saturday, February 8, 2020, 1:40 PM, Philip Barnes
wrote:
On Sat, 2020-02-08 at 16:12 +, Mikel Maron wrote:
To accommodate time zones,
On Sat, 2020-02-08 at 16:12 +, Mikel Maron wrote:
> To accommodate time zones, we’ll hold this initial meeting twice, the
> second at 1700 UTC on the same day, Wednesday February 12. I’ve
> blocked out an hour for each, but if you can only attend a portion
> that’s fine too.
Hi Mikel
Would it
To accommodate time zones, we’ll hold this initial meeting twice, the second at
1700 UTC on the same day, Wednesday February 12. I’ve blocked out an hour for
each, but if you can only attend a portion that’s fine too.
Expect we’ll discuss the scope of work laid out by the Board, sketch initial
