Re: [GSoC 2013] contribute to django-deployer for deploying django to PaaS easily

2013-05-02 Thread Jacob Kaplan-Moss
While I share some of Andrew's concerns, I do think this is still a fairly good topic for GSoC. However, I think the only way it could happen would be if Nate wants to mentor the project; Nate, can you mentor? If so, you should hook up with Andrew and make sure you apply to be a mentor so we can

Re: Improve annotation and aggregation

2013-05-02 Thread Andre Terra
May I recommend you browse Trac and take a look at the pending tickets regarding aggregation? This query should give you enough food for thought: http://goo.gl/vvraU It is my understanding that Anssi Kääriäinen is working on an ORM refactor, so speaking to him seems fundamental if you really

Re: Improve annotation and aggregation

2013-05-02 Thread Russell Keith-Magee
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 4:31 AM, nimesh ghelani wrote: > Hey, > Will like reviews on my proposal > > https://gist.github.com/nims11/dbd2f52677377eb60c07 > > Hi Nimesh, At present, this isn't an especially compelling proposal. The bulk of what you're proposing is

Improve annotation and aggregation

2013-05-02 Thread nimesh ghelani
Hey, Will like reviews on my proposal https://gist.github.com/nims11/dbd2f52677377eb60c07 Thanks and Regards, Nimesh Ghelani -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from

Re:

2013-05-02 Thread Karen Tracey
You posted this here less than an hour after posting on django-users, that hardly seems time enough to consider it "ignored" there. Also, you might want to include a subject in your emails, particularly for high-traffic lists I would not be surprised if some people simply scan the subjects for

Re: [GSoC 2013] contribute to django-deployer for deploying django to PaaS easily

2013-05-02 Thread LittleQ@NCCU, Taiwan
Hello, Andrew On Thursday, May 2, 2013 4:11:35 PM UTC+8, Andrew Godwin wrote: > > I feel like the deployment problem is one that cannot be solved in a mere > 12 weeks and I'm not sure django-deployer is the right approach to > encourage for this - it sits at the wrong level of abstraction and

Re:

2013-05-02 Thread Alex Gaynor
I'll also second that, in addition to the methodological flaws I see, they don't do any testing of running Django under PyPy, which has seen significant speed boosts in the wild. Alex On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote: > On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 1:34

Fwd:

2013-05-02 Thread Jacob Kaplan-Moss
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 1:34 PM, Michał Nowotka wrote: > http://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=data-r4 django performance is > really bad comparing to other popular web frameworks. Are there any plans to > change this situation? First, there are some very serious

[no subject]

2013-05-02 Thread Michał Nowotka
I'm sorry for crossposting this question but my emails are somehow ignored on django-users list... According to that webpage: http://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=data-r4 django performance is really bad comparing to other popular web frameworks. Are there any plans to change this

Re: GSoC proposal for the "Adding New Feature of Dynamic Forms and Enhancement of Django-forms"

2013-05-02 Thread Satinderpal Singh
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 7:09 PM, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote: > Hi Satinderpal - > > Thanks for your effort! Unfortunately, I think you've still got a long > way to go. > > Your proposal is fundamentally quite vague. You seem to understand > some of the problems with the current

Re: Django 1.6 release timeline

2013-05-02 Thread Jacob Kaplan-Moss
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 4:42 AM, Aymeric Augustin wrote: > Shouldn't we push the alpha to May 23rd, all the more since we plan to fork > the stable/1.6.x branch at the beta? That sounds reasonable; give us a chance to get any work done at DjangoCon Europe into

Re: GSoC proposal for the "Adding New Feature of Dynamic Forms and Enhancement of Django-forms"

2013-05-02 Thread Jacob Kaplan-Moss
Hi Satinderpal - Thanks for your effort! Unfortunately, I think you've still got a long way to go. Your proposal is fundamentally quite vague. You seem to understand some of the problems with the current forms API, but I really can't tell exactly what you plan to do about it. The actual meat of

Re: [GSoC 2013] Better, smarter forms

2013-05-02 Thread Nicolas Bouliane
These are pretty clever ideas that would have been useful indeed. I'll find some time to peruse these tickets and revise my proposal. On Wednesday, May 1, 2013 12:45:11 PM UTC-4, Nicolas Bouliane wrote: > > Linked here is my proposal for the 2013 Google Summer of Code. As > suggested by Jacob

Re: GSOC: Deadline soon!

2013-05-02 Thread Nicolas Bouliane
Thank you for your kind words! I will try to find a few hours to correctly edit it. On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 8:14 PM, Russell Keith-Magee wrote: > Hi Nicholas, > > I agree that there's a lot of overlap between your proposal and > django-floppyforms -- but I still think

Re: Django 1.6 release timeline

2013-05-02 Thread Aymeric Augustin
2013/5/2 Andrew Godwin > get something together for DjangoCon EU That's a good point. DjangoCon EU sprints are on May 18-19th. Shouldn't we push the alpha to May 23rd, all the more since we plan to fork the stable/1.6.x branch at the beta? -- Aymeric. -- You received

Re: Django 1.6 release timeline

2013-05-02 Thread Andrew Godwin
I'm happy with this - I doubt schema alteration will be mergeable by the 15th (though I'm trying to get something together for DjangoCon EU) and I want to encourage smaller release cycles. And the new transaction stuff is great, damnit, we should ship that. Andrew On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 4:45

Re: [GSoC 2013] contribute to django-deployer for deploying django to PaaS easily

2013-05-02 Thread Andrew Godwin
I feel like the deployment problem is one that cannot be solved in a mere 12 weeks and I'm not sure django-deployer is the right approach to encourage for this - it sits at the wrong level of abstraction and looks pretty fragile, and I'd be hesitant to put any sort of official emphasis on it

Re: Proposal for simplifying part of the GCBV API slightly.

2013-05-02 Thread Tom Christie
I've created ticket #20432 for this proposal. I don't know if it needs to go to 'design decision needed', but if it gets approved I'll plan to work on it at the DjangoCon sprints, aiming for the 1.6 alpha. Tom On Monday, 22 April 2013 14:40:09

Re: Test failures under Oracle

2013-05-02 Thread VernonCole
How about creating django.contrib.db.backends for databases with a small maintainer "bus size" number? Oracle and django-mssql could live there. They would have less than full support, but still some level of official recognition? -- Vernon Cole On Wednesday, May 1, 2013 4:31:58 AM UTC-6,