Working towards a simpler GCBV implementation?

I'm excited about Django Vanilla Views. I think the GCBV implementation in Django is pretty good (I use GCBV got everything - leads to better extensibility), but a simpler version of the same functionality would be great. I'm NEVER certain of whether I'm using the right mixins and base class

Re: IRC users invited to support PyCon Ireland Django sprinters

As an FYI, I will also be on site for the sprints, hopefully covering some more experienced contributors, and working through some patches I said I'd review (hi Loic!) but haven't yet. Marc On 3 Oct 2013 17:00, "Daniele Procida" wrote: > I'm running a "Don't be afraid to

IRC users invited to support PyCon Ireland Django sprinters

I'm running a "Don't be afraid to commit workshop" at PyCon Ireland. The sprints will be on 14th to 15th October - . Last time it worked brilliantly well having a few active people in #django-sprint. If anyone can be around for the next one, that would be

Re: AbstractUser to get more abstract

Hey Russ, On Monday, September 30, 2013 7:17:14 PM UTC-6, Russell Keith-Magee wrote: > > Hi Rocky, > > On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Rocky Meza > wrote: > >> >> Hi, >> >> I'm another one of the authtools devs. >> >> On Tuesday, September 24, 2013 6:04:17 PM UTC-6, Luke

Re: Permission to use some Django material ?

On Thursday, October 3, 2013 11:17:49 AM UTC+2, Tom Christie wrote: > > Hi Stan, > > I would simply include some text in the license noting that some images > are taken from the Django source and their usage is subject to it's > license, with a link to the Django license. I'm sure that'd be

Re: Idea about authentication

We already committed a fix for pbkdf2, the DOS vector no longer exists (at least not in this form): https://github.com/django/django/commit/68540fe4df44492571bc610a0a043d3d02b3d320 On Thursday, October 3, 2013 9:56:14 AM UTC+2, Ram Rachum wrote: > > Hi everybody, > > I've submitted the

Re: Permission to use some Django material ?

Hi Stan, I would simply include some text in the license noting that some images are taken from the Django source and their usage is subject to it's license, with a link to the Django license. I'm sure that'd be plenty sufficient attribution. All the best, Tom On Thursday, 3 October 2013

Re: Permission to use some Django material ?

Thanks Russ, Do you know if there is a best way to "suitably attribute" images ? Maybe a text file beside REAME.txt / LICENCE.txt ? Cheers, Stanislas On Thursday, October 3, 2013 11:02:04 AM UTC+2, Russell Keith-Magee wrote: > > Hi Stanislas, > > Django is licensed under the terms of the BSD

Working towards a simpler GCBV implementation?

Hi folks, I recently released an alternative implementation of Django's existing class based views. The intention was to mirror the *exact* same set of functionality that we currently provide, but simplify the implementation and API. It's nothing cleverer or grander than a clean re-write,

Re: Permission to use some Django material ?

Hi Stanislas, Django is licensed under the terms of the BSD license. This means you can use any of Django's source code -- including images -- for whatever purpose, commercial or otherwise, as long as whatever you use is suitably attributed, and you don't make any claims that what you've done is

Permission to use some Django material ?

Hi, I am working on a small app providing Ajax search for a ModelChoiceFieldLike in addition to an admin-like related lookup (pop up to changelist). Is it possible for me to embed the magnifier image from admin statics ? (static/admin/img/selector-search.gif) Thanks. Stanislas. -- You

Re: Idea about authentication

Hi everybody, I've submitted the patch, and corrected it, and it's been sitting on the issue tracker for 2 weeks without anyone commenting. Does anyone care to discuss this? I want to have this merged in, or discuss any problems in merging it in. On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 11:27 PM, Ram Rachum

Re: A policy on calling super()

Hi, I'm jumping in the discussion as I've tried - hard - to do something similar in the past. However, I'll second what has been said: mixins should be on the left side. Is there a reason your code can't be similar to: #class View(object): #def __init__(self): #print "View init"