Re: Bitwise operations in QuerySets?

Hi Charlie, On 03/16/2015 02:13 PM, Charlie Hayes wrote: > How do you evaluate if something is common enough to warrant inclusion? Frequency of people asking "how do I do this?" in django-users or IRC, popularity of third-party libraries solving the problem, etc. It's not exactly scientific, but

Re: Bitwise operations in QuerySets?

How do you evaluate if something is common enough to warrant inclusion? -Charlie On Tuesday, October 30, 2007 at 9:14:09 PM UTC-5, Malcolm Tredinnick wrote: > > On Tue, 2007-10-30 at 17:03 -0400, George Vilches wrote: > > What I want to do: Assume I have an integer column in a table that > >

Help needed with Oracle GIS backend

Hi, In ticket #24214, I built a patch to replace all geo-specific Manager methods by class-based ORM functions. This will allow us to get rid of convoluted query code in the GeoDjango ORM. It will also be far much easier to add support for specific database functions. The code is already in

Re: Interested in GSoC idea "Replace Form Media Class"

Thanks Tim for letting me know. I think I should better work on "Test framework cleanup" idea :) On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 04:01:53PM -0700, Tim Graham wrote: > Jannis Leidel, who's worked a fair bit on django-compressor, said this: > "I’m not convinced that this is feasible in the way the OP

Re: Django Admin New Look

2015-03-16 15:41 GMT+01:00 elky : > I'm going to make pull request this week, so in case of success I hope > people will have enough time to test new theme in alpha and beta releases. > For what it's worth, I've deployed your theme on an internal application and received

Re: GSoC 2015: Django Best Practices Update

Please put some more time into fleshing out the details of your proposal. As it stands now, you haven't presented much to discuss. Looking for related tickets is part of your job in researching and writing the proposal. On Sunday, March 15, 2015 at 1:59:54 PM UTC-4, Asif Saifuddin wrote: > >

Re: GSOC 2015: Improving the less popular database backends

I like the idea of establishing a convention for discovering backend specific tests. As it is now, it seems that third-party backends need to have a customized version of Django's own runtests.py which duplicates a lot of code. Example for django-mssql:

Re: Django Admin New Look

As far as I remember the main argument of that suggestion was third-party apps will be broken in terms of color scheme (this was in green-theme discussion). But now we have new look with same colors as default admin. So I don't think we need additional setting to switch themes - primarily

Re: Django Admin New Look

In some previous discussion, it was suggested to have a toggle between the new and old designs to ease the transition. I guess this could be something like a "theme" attribute on AdminSite. Do you think this is required? It seems this could be a non-trivial maintenance burden if we have to test

Re: GSOC 2015: Improving the less popular database backends

I can't answer for sure because there are still open issues there (e.g. what do you do in the face of multiple databases using different engines). But for the "clear cut" issues, my estimate is that they shouldn't take more than a few days. Shai. On Sunday 15 March 2015 14:03:44 Yichun Duan

Re: Gsoc 2015: SQLAlchemy / NoSQL integration

Hi, I was trying to run the django-mailer written by Daniel. On doing migrate or runserver i am getting the following error: django.core.management.base.SystemCheckError: SystemCheckError: System check identified some issues: ERRORS: : (admin.E106)