Re: Django 1.4 roadmap

On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 6:10 AM, Luke Plant wrote: > On 28/11/11 20:33, Adrian Holovaty wrote: >> I plan on starting this next week. Is there a list somewhere of what >> needs to get done? If not, I can make it, but obviously it'd be great >> if that already existed. > > 1)

Re: Django 1.4 roadmap

2011/11/29 Luke Plant > 2) Broken tests: > > http://ci.djangoproject.com/builds > > It looks like tests are failing on Oracle and spatialite. I guess any > failing tests need to be added to the release blockers. > I don't think there are any reproducible failures under

Re: Django 1.4 roadmap

On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 5:10 AM, Luke Plant wrote: > 2) Broken tests: > > http://ci.djangoproject.com/builds > > It looks like tests are failing on Oracle and spatialite. I guess any > failing tests need to be added to the release blockers. I'll make a note to go through

Re: Django 1.4 roadmap

On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 13:40, Tomek Paczkowski wrote: > What happend to "SVN is least common denominator"? > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Django developers" group. > To view this discussion on the web visit >

Re: Django 1.4 roadmap

> > > Since we never had a list of features that we were committing to adding > for 1.4, I don't see any reason why we can't release an alpha as soon as > > the release blockers are dealt with. Agreed. There will > always be extra

Re: Django 1.4 roadmap

What happend to "SVN is least common denominator"? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/django-developers/-/5DgmsJ17_8oJ. To post to this group, send

Re: Django 1.4 roadmap

On 29.11.2011, at 13:31, Luke Plant wrote: > On 29/11/11 12:23, Jannis Leidel wrote: > >> Definitely, we've never intended to ship Python 3 support in 1.4 and I >> would even say that targeting 1.5 is a very eager goal giving the amount >> of code and non-code work is required to be done for a

Re: Django 1.4 roadmap

On 29/11/11 12:23, Jannis Leidel wrote: > Definitely, we've never intended to ship Python 3 support in 1.4 and I > would even say that targeting 1.5 is a very eager goal giving the amount > of code and non-code work is required to be done for a full port (e.g. > docs, dependencies, etc). I think

Re: Django 1.4 roadmap

On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 8:10 PM, Luke Plant wrote: > On 28/11/11 20:33, Adrian Holovaty wrote: > >> And that someone will be me. See my post here: >> http://www.holovaty.com/writing/back-to-django/ > > Great stuff! > >> I plan on starting this next week. Is there a list

Re: Django 1.4 roadmap

On 29.11.2011, at 13:10, Luke Plant wrote: > On 28/11/11 20:33, Adrian Holovaty wrote: > >> I plan on starting this next week. Is there a list somewhere of what >> needs to get done? If not, I can make it, but obviously it'd be great >> if that already existed. > > 3) We don't have a fully

Re: Django 1.4 roadmap

On 28/11/11 20:33, Adrian Holovaty wrote: > And that someone will be me. See my post here: > http://www.holovaty.com/writing/back-to-django/ Great stuff! > I plan on starting this next week. Is there a list somewhere of what > needs to get done? If not, I can make it, but obviously it'd be

Re: Django 1.4 roadmap

- *Release version 1.4.* - *Move to Git/GitHub.* I Now, that's a start! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To view this discussion on the web visit

Re: Django 1.4 roadmap

On Nov 28, 9:33 pm, Adrian Holovaty wrote: > On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 6:40 AM, Russell Keith-Magee > > wrote: > > So -- what we need is for someone in the core team who is able to find > > the resources in their schedule to commit to shepherding a

Re: Django 1.4 roadmap

On 28 nov. 2011, at 21:33, Adrian Holovaty wrote: > And that someone will be me. See my post here: > http://www.holovaty.com/writing/back-to-django/ Awesome! > Is there a list somewhere of what needs to get done? > If not, I can make it, but obviously it'd be great if that already existed. I

Re: Django 1.4 roadmap

On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 6:40 AM, Russell Keith-Magee wrote: > So -- what we need is for someone in the core team who is able to find > the resources in their schedule to commit to shepherding a release. > Speaking for myself, I know that this almost certainly isn't going

Re: Django 1.4 roadmap

On Nov 28, 4:40 am, Russell Keith-Magee wrote: > Any practical suggestions on how we can improve on this situation will > be gratefully accepted. Core has grown, but it seems to me there is a fair amount of cultural and procedural knowledge that more veteran core

Re: Django 1.4 roadmap

On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 5:05 PM, Marcob wrote: > On Nov 26, 1:19 pm, Aymeric Augustin > wrote: >> On 24 nov. 2011, at 16:53, Marcob wrote: >> >> > I realize that this is a volunteer-based project, but I was wondering >> > if you have any

Re: Django 1.4 roadmap

On Nov 26, 1:19 pm, Aymeric Augustin wrote: > On 24 nov. 2011, at 16:53, Marcob wrote: > > > I realize that this is a volunteer-based project, but I was wondering > > if you have any updates regarding the wiki page for the 1.4 roadmap? > >

Django 1.4 roadmap

Dear Django Core Developers, first and foremost, thank you for Django, which is a wonderful project. I realize that this is a volunteer-based project, but I was wondering if you have any updates regarding the wiki page for the 1.4 roadmap? (https://code.djangoproject.com/wiki/Version1.4Roadmap)

Re: Django 1.4 Roadmap

Hi, On Monday, August 8, 2011 2:19:07 AM UTC+2, Russell Keith-Magee wrote: > > someone who has the spare time to manage the release process. That's > been me for the last two releases; I'm fairly certain I won't have the > spare cycles to make it three in a row. > Is the release process

Re: Django 1.4 Roadmap

On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Russell Keith-Magee wrote: > On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 12:40 PM, h3 wrote: > > idk .. but I'll make one anyway. > > > > I whish there was something like this for django: > http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/ > > > > Good

Re: Django 1.4 Roadmap

On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 12:40 PM, h3 wrote: > idk .. but I'll make one anyway. > > I whish there was something like this for django: > http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/ > > Good news: the site's engine is Open Source > Bad news:  it's ROR (http://bbyidx.com/) The fact that it is

Re: Django 1.4 Roadmap

On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 6:16 PM, Srik wrote: > Hello All, > > I believe https://code.djangoproject.com/wiki/Version1.4Roadmap needs > update badly considering 1.3 was released 4 months ago and 1.4 Roadmap > was never updated. Agreed -- we haven't been very good with public

Re: Django 1.4 Roadmap

idk .. but I'll make one anyway. I whish there was something like this for django: http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/ Good news: the site's engine is Open Source Bad news: it's ROR (http://bbyidx.com/) Pretty decent alternative: http://www.google.com/moderator/ On Aug 6, 3:12 pm, rvanhoepen

Re: Django 1.4 Roadmap

Can we make suggestions for new features to be added to the list? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to

Django 1.4 Roadmap

Hello All, I believe https://code.djangoproject.com/wiki/Version1.4Roadmap needs update badly considering 1.3 was released 4 months ago and 1.4 Roadmap was never updated. There seems to be good amount of work going on as per commits to trunk but what exactly are the goals of 1.4. Will it be