Re: ORM refactoring, part 2

2012-09-26 Thread Jonas Obrist
, August 25, 2012 9:35:02 PM UTC+2, Anssi Kääriäinen wrote: > > I have done some more ORM refactoring work. I thought it would be a > good idea to post a summary of what is going on. > > First, I haven't committed the utils.tree refactoring patch I was > planning to commit [https://g

Re: ORM refactoring, part 2

2012-09-25 Thread Jacob Kaplan-Moss
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Alex Gaynor wrote: > My view is these things are 100% undocumented, 100% internal, anyone using > them is 100% on their on. Simply put, if we can't make changes to these APIs > without having to worry, what's the point in having a backwards

Re: ORM refactoring, part 2

2012-09-25 Thread Alex Gaynor
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 7:25 AM, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote: > On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 3:23 AM, Anssi Kääriäinen > wrote: > > I'd like to postpone these to early next month so that I have more > > time to help in reviews and pushing some new features in.

Re: ORM refactoring, part 2

2012-09-25 Thread Jacob Kaplan-Moss
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 3:23 AM, Anssi Kääriäinen wrote: > I'd like to postpone these to early next month so that I have more > time to help in reviews and pushing some new features in. Other > options are postponing review work, and postponing these patches to > 1.6. As

Re: ORM refactoring, part 2

2012-09-25 Thread Anssi Kääriäinen
On 25 elo, 22:35, Anssi Kääriäinen <anssi.kaariai...@thl.fi> wrote: > I have done some more ORM refactoring work. I thought it would be a > good idea to post a summary of what is going on. > > First, I haven't committed the utils.tree refactoring patch I was > plan

Re: ORM refactoring, part 2

2012-08-27 Thread Luke Plant
Anssi, I just got back from holiday. I hope to be able to review at least some of these patches within the next 2 weeks. If you don't hear from me in that time, I'd encourage you to carry on anyway. Thanks, Luke On 25/08/12 20:35, Anssi Kääriäinen wrote: > I have done some more ORM refactor

Re: ORM refactoring, part 2

2012-08-25 Thread Alex Gaynor
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 12:35 PM, Anssi Kääriäinen <anssi.kaariai...@thl.fi>wrote: > I have done some more ORM refactoring work. I thought it would be a > good idea to post a summary of what is going on. > > First, I haven't committed the utils.tree refactoring patch I was &g

ORM refactoring, part 2

2012-08-25 Thread Anssi Kääriäinen
I have done some more ORM refactoring work. I thought it would be a good idea to post a summary of what is going on. First, I haven't committed the utils.tree refactoring patch I was planning to commit [https://github.com/akaariai/django/commits/ refactor_utils_tree]. The reason is that I now

Re: ORM refactoring

2011-10-10 Thread Jonas H.
On 10/10/2011 04:59 PM, Anssi Kääriäinen wrote: In the perfect world you could have a SQLA backend, or qs.as_sqla() method. That would be neat, yes. QuerySet chaining could be hard to implement, though (or does SQLA have support for something like that?). But in my opinion this is another

Re: ORM refactoring

2011-10-10 Thread Carl Meyer
ld be nice to know if there is support > for ORM refactoring. I am not sure the "wrapper around SQLAlchemy" idea is at all feasible, for any number of reasons; it's certainly not an idea that should hold up other improvements. I do think there are parts of the ORM that could really benefit from the

Re: ORM refactoring

2011-10-10 Thread Anssi Kääriäinen
On Oct 10, 4:13 pm, Luke Plant wrote: > One of the problems is that it can be very hard to review refactorings. > For example, I recently checked in rev 16929 [1] from ivan_virabyan's > patch, and reviewing it was hard, despite the fact that it was a very > good quality

Re: ORM refactoring

2011-10-10 Thread Luke Plant
ORM > is just fine now, or that there are higher importance items. Before > continuing my hacking, it would be nice to know if there is support > for ORM refactoring. It was me who suggested the idea of basing the ORM on SQLAlchemy in future, on my blog [2]. It would be a very large ch

Re: ORM refactoring

2011-10-10 Thread Alexander Schepanovski
opposite direction and make it a wrapper around SQLAlchemy > (I saw this mentioned somewhere some time ago). Or decide that the ORM > is just fine now, or that there are higher importance items. Before > continuing my hacking, it would be nice to know if there is support > for ORM refa

ORM refactoring

2011-10-09 Thread Anssi Kääriäinen
. Before continuing my hacking, it would be nice to know if there is support for ORM refactoring. Thank you for your time, - Anssi Kääriäinen -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email