Re: Add support for filter arguments in queryset.exists() and queryset.count()

2019-01-19 Thread charettes
To echo my comments on the PR I don't like the idea of relaying args and kwargs to filter() as it I think it adds little value considering it paints us in a corner with regards to future count()/exists() API change. For example if we ever want to add `distinct` kwarg and fields arg passing to

Re: What do you think about unify templates feature?

2019-01-19 Thread J . Pablo Martín Cobos
El sáb., 19 ene. 2019 7:08, Jani Tiainen escribió: > Hi, > > You said that this doesn't require any change in Django at all. > > So this doesn't need to be in Django at all, it can survive as its own and > that way it should be. > > So make your enhancement as reusable app and release it to

Re: What do you think about unify templates feature?

2019-01-19 Thread Jani Tiainen
Hi. Unfortunately Django is already big. Every new feature requires careful consideration since it adds maintenance burden to already loaded maintainers. So best and pretty much only way to make your feature appear in Django itself is to prove that your solution is widely adopted in everyday use

Re: [Looking for feedback] Make Admin raw_id_fields the default choice for FKs, or project-wide configurable

2019-01-19 Thread Santiago Basulto
Haha, sorry, got overly excited. What's the usual process to make these sort of decisions in these cases? Should we ask the users list? The setting proposal is purely from my perspective as a user. For *my* (completely unilateral) point of view, this is very important and I'd love to have a

Re: [Looking for feedback] Make Admin raw_id_fields the default choice for FKs, or project-wide configurable

2019-01-19 Thread Adam Johnson
> > For *my* (completely unilateral) point of view, this is very important and > I'd love to have a place to just flip a switch and change them all; well, > I'd even prefer for it to be the default behavior, but I know selects look > cool too. > How many projects do you need this on? I think the

Re: Add support for filter arguments in queryset.exists() and queryset.count()

2019-01-19 Thread Adam Johnson
-1 on this suggestion from me too. The current API is composable ( https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Composability ), the suggestion is to make it less so, and make it harder to learn On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 at 08:01, charettes wrote: > To echo my comments on the PR I don't like the idea of relaying

Re: [Looking for feedback] Make Admin raw_id_fields the default choice for FKs, or project-wide configurable

2019-01-19 Thread Carlton Gibson
> On 19 Jan 2019, at 11:48, Santiago Basulto wrote: > > Haha, sorry, got overly excited. What's the usual process to make these sort > of decisions in these cases? Should we ask the users list? No problem. :) We make decisions here. Say you’d have opened a Trac ticket for this, I’d have

Re: What do you think about unify templates feature?

2019-01-19 Thread Adam Johnson
I agree, I'd like to see a third party package too. I'm all up for seeing improvements in template rendering speed but working code in a third party package is way more valuable than more discussion. Many of Django's major features in the past (e.g. SecurityMiddleware, Migrations) were third

Re: Google Summer of Code 2019

2019-01-19 Thread akki
Hi One of the most difficult things for me while preparing my GSoC proposal was getting myself acquainted to Django's humungous code base. To prepare a proposal one should know what modules they would need to modify & what part of the code they will need to work with. To do that one should *at

Re: Potential suspension of Channels development

2019-01-19 Thread Dipankar
Hi, I am also interested to contribute on this topic. Please guide. On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 11:37 PM Andrew Godwin wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm writing to you all to update you on the current situation of Channels > and related libraries (channels-redis and Daphne) and potentially ask for > help. >

Translate Content From django-ckeditor

2019-01-19 Thread Anh Nguyen
Hi everyone, I’m using RichTextUploadField() for my content’s post. So now i need to translate this content to other languages. Im gonna using model-translate’s package. But the content are the HTML tags from RichTextUploadField So now. what thing i need to do. Please give me some solutions.

Messages without text in the messages framework

2019-01-19 Thread Sebastian Lechner
Dear Django developer community, often I would like to trigger a message to the user with the message rendered dynamically in the client-side JS code. I use the message framework's tags to differentiate between the different messages in JS. Usually, I will define the message's text on the

Re: Add support for filter arguments in queryset.exists() and queryset.count()

2019-01-19 Thread Robert Marsanyi
I agree, -1, for composability. I must also say, I find the current idiom easier to read than the proposed version, but by far the more important factor to me is the violation of composability by bundling different kinds of functionality into one call. One of the nice features of querysets.

Re: What do you think about unify templates feature?

2019-01-19 Thread J . Pablo Martín Cobos
I reply between lines, El sáb., 19 ene. 2019 a las 11:00, Jani Tiainen () escribió: > Hi. > > Unfortunately Django is already big. Every new feature requires careful > consideration since it adds maintenance burden to already loaded > maintainers. > Yes, I know it. > > So best and pretty much

Re: What do you think about unify templates feature?

2019-01-19 Thread J . Pablo Martín Cobos
Bonus track: If you have a template with complete HTML (without blocks). You can add to this command another features like compress HTML or use line styles (using pyliner[1]) and win more time yet :-) Because this feature does not consume run time, but this feature waste preprocessing time, like

Re: Translate Content From django-ckeditor

2019-01-19 Thread Adam Johnson
This mailing list is for the development of Django itself, not for support using Django. Please use the. django-users mailing list for that, or IRC #django on freenode, or a site like Stack Overflow. On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 at 11:16, Anh Nguyen wrote: > Hi everyone, > I’m using

Re: What do you think about unify templates feature?

2019-01-19 Thread J . Pablo Martín Cobos
I reply between lines, El sáb., 19 ene. 2019 a las 12:31, Adam Johnson () escribió: > I agree, I'd like to see a third party package too. > If I have any time I will do it. And I will say something in this thread. > > I'm all up for seeing improvements in template rendering speed but working

Re: Potential suspension of Channels development

2019-01-19 Thread Carlton Gibson
Hey Andrew. I've been thinking a lot about this. You clearly shouldn't be maintaining Channels single-handedly indefinitely. On Thursday, 17 January 2019 19:07:06 UTC+1, Andrew Godwin wrote: > > Given that, if nobody else can step forward to take over, I'll have to put > those three projects